Austin City Council: Citizens should not have the right to vote on CodeNEXT

Austin City Council

Austin City Council

Austin City Council chose not to give residents the right to vote on CodeNEXT or any future rewrite of the land development code following a 6-4 vote in the early hours of Friday.

Whether residents will get to vote on that right to vote remains in question as legal uncertainties continue to swirl around a recent validated petition signed by 26,000 residents who demand a say on the results of the highly contested 5-year, nearly $9 million project to rewrite the city’s land development code.

The narrow vote came at the tail end of a more than 16-hour City Council meeting that began Thursday and stretched into Friday morning. Those voting in favor of giving the citizen’s the right to vote were District 9 Council Member Kathie Tovo, District 1 Council Member Ora Houston, District 7 Council Member Leslie Pool and District 10 Council Member Alison Alter. All other council members, with the exception of the absent Ellen Troxclair from District 8 voted against the motion.

Earlier in the month, officials, including Austin Mayor Steve Adler, said giving voting power to the residents would result in inequity. He said it would give more power to the wealthier areas of town—areas that usually have greater voter turnout—rather than ensuring each area of town‘s vote was weighed equally through their elected representative.

Will there be an election?


The submission of a validated petition for citizen-initiated legislation typically goes one of two ways. Either City Council votes to adopt the legislation, or City Council is legally obligated to call an election to let the residents decide. However, earlier in the day, City Council received legal advice that they are not required to call an election in this instance.

C. Robert Heath, attorney from firm Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP, told City Council on Thursday not only are they not required, but have no authority to act on the validated petition. Heath said state law holds that zoning laws are outside the scope of citizen-initiated legislation.

In a Feb. 21 memo to city attorney Anne Morgan, Heath said rejection of the petition would likely result in a lawsuit from the petitioners.

“The outcome of litigation is never guaranteed,” Heath wrote. “However, the significant weight of legal authority supports the conclusion that an election is not required.”

During Heath’s testimony to council on Thursday, an audience member shouted, “See you in court.”

Bill Bunch, an attorney with the local organization Save Our Springs Alliance, told City Council Thursday they are legally required to put the question on the ballot. From there a judge can decide whether the question is valid, but the question has to be placed on the ballot.

Fred Lewis, an attorney and treasurer with Let Us Vote Austin—the political action committee that helped submit the petition—said the city could legally decide on its own to give citizens the right to vote on CodeNEXT.

Background


A petition allegedly signed by more than 32,000 people who want to vote on CodeNEXT was submitted in March to the city clerk by Let Us Vote Austin and the volunteer group IndyAustin.

The petition—considered an attempt at citizen-initiated legislation—aimed to force a citywide vote on whether residents should have the right to vote on comprehensive rewrites of the city’s land development code. In order to force an election, the petition needed five percent of the city’s registered voters, or 20,000 signatures.

In this case, the citizen-initiated legislation asserted citizens retain the right to vote on a code rewrite. If the petition is validated, citizens would then vote in November 2018 on whether they agree with that assertion. If a majority voted in favor of the legislation, citizens would be given that right, and the actual vote on CodeNEXT would not come until the following November.

On April 23, the City Clerk’s Office announced the petition’s validation, with an estimate of 26,000 signatures. A sufficient and validated petition would normally initiate an election, however city officials continue to raise questions.
By Christopher Neely
Christopher Neely is Community Impact's Austin City Hall reporter. A New Jersey native, Christopher moved to Austin in 2016 following two years of community reporting along the Jersey Shore. His bylines have appeared in the Los Angeles Times, Baltimore Su


MOST RECENT

A map of the Bella Fortuna PID
Travis County holds off on making development funds available for South Austin Bella Fortuna PID through payments from future homeowners

Travis County commissioners cited concern that funds would not be used to adequately buy down the cost of homes, making them affordable.

Austin City Hall (Christopher Neely/Community impact Newspaper)
Some on Austin City Council want more of its $272 million coronavirus relief package to go to residents in need

City Council will determine how much to put toward direct financial assistance at its June 4 meeting.

South Austin-based Art + Academy will hold online camps this summer. (Courtesy  Art + Academy)
South Austin children can participate in these online camps this summer

The following Austin-area businesses are offering online or virtual camp programs this summer.

Candidates in the Senate District 14 special election responded to Community Impact Newspaper's questions about their campaigns to fill the vacant seat in the Texas Senate. (Design by Shelby Savage/Community Impact Newspaper)
Q&A: Senate District 14 candidates discuss the issues ahead of July 14 election

There are six candidates running in the special election to fill the seat of former Sen. Kirk Watson through 2022.

Travis County judge pushes back against attorney general's reprimand of stay-at-home order

Travis County Judge Sam Biscoe responded to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's warning that county coronavirus orders conflicted with the state's.

Volunteers load cars at a distribution event in South Austin on May 28. (Nicholas Cicale/Community Impact Newspaper)
Six food distribution events scheduled by Central Texas Food Bank in June

Residents who face food insecurities can drive up with their vehicles for no-contact pickup.

Cap Metro and its community partners have combined to delivery more than 300,000 meals to community members in need. (Jack Flagler/Community Impact Newspaper)
Capital Metro, community partners deliver more than 300K meals to community

The public transportation agency is teaming up with businesses and nonprofits to provide meals for those in need.

The Austin Central Library will reopen after it was closed for more than two months to prevent the spread of the coronavirus. (John Cox/Community Impact Newspaper)
Austin libraries, in-person pet adoptions to begin reopening June 1

The Austin Parks and Recreation Department will begin opening amenities, but there is no date set to open Barton Springs Pool.

(Courtesy Fotolia)
New school schedules and a road opening: Latest news from Central Texas

Read the latest news from Community Impact Newspaper's coverage of the Central Texas area.

A photo of the Travis County headquarters sign
Austin Public Health officials say they plan to increase support to Latino community, where coronavirus hospitalizations are up

As of May 26, 76 Hispanic individuals in Travis County were hospitalized with COVID-19, representing around 78% of all hospitalizations.

Here are the latest coronavirus updates for Travis County. (Community Impact Newspaper staff)
92nd coronavirus death reported in Travis County

Active hospitalizations in the metropolitan area dropped from 97 to 88 over the past 24 hours.

The Central Texas Food Bank hosted a food distribution event in South Austin May 28. (Nicholas Cicale/Community Impact Newspaper)
Central Texas Food Bank serves 1,071 families at South Austin distribution event

The food bank created the emergency drive-up events to reach more individuals during the coronavirus pandemic.