7 years' worth of Central Austin home demolitions on track to exceed numbers for the previous 30

Editor's note: Scroll to the bottom of the article for an interactive map with demolition data.


Under the economic pressure of Austin’s rapid growth, the traditional housing stock in the city’s central neighborhoods is crumbling to bulldozers and wrecking balls at an accelerated rate.


A Community Impact Newspaper analysis shows 1,773 residential demolitions in Central Austin between 2010 and 2017. By comparison, 1,900 similar demolitions occurred between 1980 and 2009.




The past 37 years of demolitions in central austin The number of home demolitions in Central Austin since 2010 is on pace to eclipse the number of demolitions between 1980 and 2009 by the end of 2017.[/caption]

Many experts say a combination of factors contribute to the trend: a lack of diverse housing options, heightened land demand despite limited supply, depreciation of the city’s housing stock, and a complex land development code and permitting process that limits new development—each of which is exacerbated by the city’s inevitable growth.


People want to live in the center of the city because they are fed up with sprawl, said Glen Coleman, an urbanist and owner of South Llano Strategies, an advocacy firm that specializes in land-use policy.


“Is the rate of demolition good or bad? That’s value-neutral,” Coleman said. “If we are systematically bulldozing affordable houses in favor of unaffordable housing, then that’s bad.”


The data points to such a trend. Smaller, more affordable single-family homes are often demolished and replaced by larger, more expensive ones. This has caused the value of neighborhood lots, most of which are zoned for single-family homes, to rise, increasing property tax bills and forcing longtime Austinites out of once-affordable neighborhoods.



The neighborhoods


Bruce Wiland, chairman of the Zilker Neighborhood Association’s zoning committee, said he has lived in his one-story bungalow on Oxford Avenue since 1978. He said the spike in demolitions does not surprise him—the evidence surrounds him. His neighborhood block has had five new homes replace bungalows over the past 10 years. Another freshly cleared lot sits across the street, primed for construction.


Wiland said his property taxes today are nearly 20 times what he originally paid for his principal, interest, taxes and insurance combined. He admits to being cynical about where the city is headed.


“I’m not many years away from when I’ll have to leave the city because I can’t afford to live here anymore,” Wiland said. “The reason people came here originally was because of the character of Austin, and that’s changing.”


Single-family zoning and dated housing stock—one-story, often two-bedroom, one-bathroom starter homes built between 1930 and 1960—have characterized central neighborhoods such as Zilker for decades, but the functional minimum­­­­­ bedroom-to-bath ratio for single-family homes has changed.


According to Brandy Guthrie, president of the Austin Board of Realtors, when people get their tax bills, it is usually the land—not the structure on it—that is appreciating in value. At a certain point, it is no longer practical to pay property taxes on a $500,000 lot for a modest starter home.



The developers


Guthrie said this dilemma has turned into a business model.


According to Scott Turner, owner of Riverside Homes, an urban infill construction company, the city has hit a critical point.


“People can’t afford to stay in their neighborhoods, but the demand for land is such that something’s got to give. So what’s giving? The houses are giving,” Turner said.


This is where developers come in. Turner said his company purchases the properties, demolishes the old homes and builds anew.


“That’s essentially the flow of demolitions that is happening,” Turner said. “Because of the functional obsolescence of the house itself, the complexities in the city’s permitting process and the cost, adding onto a home is a lengthier, more risky and more expensive process than just tearing down and starting from scratch.”


Turner said the city’s zoning regulations intensify the issue. The code in many neighborhoods makes it difficult to build anything but a single-family home on the lot. The lot is expensive, and the developer needs to build a home that attracts a buyer, often resulting in larger, more modern structures. The lot sells for a higher price, which further pushes the market value for the property and neighborhood. 


Turner said this creates a self-sustaining affordability crisis. The construction of larger, more expensive single-family homes increases land value of surrounding properties. This increases property tax bills and causes economic turmoil for longtime property owners who struggle to pay the increased taxes. This forces them to sell their lot, but because the lot is so expensive and the house does not balance the price tag, the only willing buyer is a developer who then tears down the home, and—in order to sell it—builds a larger, more expensive single-family home.





Kathie Tovo District 9 Council Member Kathie Tovo[/caption]

“If we have an agreement on council that [the demolitions are] not in the best interest of the city … we can look for policy solutions that might help.”


—Kathie Tovo, District 9 Austin City Council Member



Policy perspective


District 9 Council Member Kathie Tovo said this is a “terrible trend” from a community perspective.  Demolition of traditional housing stock, she said, deteriorates the city’s “historic fabric.”  Tovo said she is focused on slowing the demolition rate.


“It’s very difficult to influence the market,” Tovo said. “What we can have sway over is the city process. If we have an agreement on council that [the demolitions are] not in the best interest of the city … we can look for policy solutions that might help.”


The historic preservation office reviews all demolition applications for homes over 50 years old. If historic value is found, staff recommends the Historic Landmark Commission place historic zoning on the property. If the property owner objects, which often happens because historic zoning impacts the high-priced property’s market value,  but eight of 11 commissioners incorporate a supermajority for approval, the case goes to city council. If that supermajority is not reached, staff releases the demolition permit.


A supermajority has proven hard to come by for the commission, a group with a history of attendance issues. Earlier in February, Tovo sponsored council action that works toward eliminating the supermajority clause in favor of a simple majority, paving an easier path for council to decide historic zoning cases.


Coleman said policy towards a demolition moratorium would only divert the economic pressure.


“The only solution I can see is either a recession, which does not sound very pleasant to me,” Coleman said. “Or, what sounds very pleasant to me and plausible is let’s have a dramatic increase in housing stock throughout the city. More multifamily, more missing middle, more single-family when it’s available and more condos and more sky-rise. We’ve got to figure out how to get more density per lot, or else these demolitions are going to accelerate.” 





Click on a ZIP code to see its demolition data. Then click the image to see the full infographic.

SHARE THIS STORY
By Christopher Neely

Christopher Neely is Community Impact's Austin City Hall reporter. A New Jersey native, Christopher moved to Austin in 2016 following two years of community reporting along the Jersey Shore. His bylines have appeared in the Los Angeles Times, Baltimore Su


MOST RECENT

Central Health off East Cesar Chavez Street.
Central Health establishes new executive medical board as first step to begin employing physicians

Following a change in state law that allows Central Health to employ and appoint physicians, the agency took its first step to hiring its own medical professionals.

The Texas Transportation Commission will consider a plan Feb. 27 to add $4.3 billion to fund an I-35 improvement project through Central Austin. (Courtesy TxDOT)
TxDOT poised to secure $4.3B for I-35 improvements in Central Austin

The Texas Transportation Commission will consider a plan to provide the funding for the project at its Feb. 27 meeting.

The Moody Center at The University of Texas broke ground in December 2019 and is scheduled to open in 2022. (Rendering courtesy Gensler)
UT plans $107.2M in new projects, including athletics practice facility next to Moody Center

A $60 million practice facility for UT's men's and women's basketball teams and women's rowing team is scheduled to open next to the Moody Center in 2022.

CTRMA updated the status of the $7.54 million Eastside Bus Plaza during a Feb. 26 meeting. (Image courtesy Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority)
Eastside Bus Plaza to get funding help from CARTS

The Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority approved an interlocal agreement with the Capital Area Rural Transportation System to help provide $2 million in funding for a large-scale bus plaza in East Austin.

Austin's Rainey Street district has become one of the city's most popular entertainment and residential districts. (Christopher Neely/Community Impact Newspaper)
912,000-sq.-ft. Rainey district project tied to WeWork clears final hurdle before Austin City Council

The project is also tied to the developers responsible for Austin's planned tallest tower at Sixth and Guadalupe streets.

Emma Freer/Community Impact Newspaper
16 things to do in Central Austin this March

This month's events include Amplify Austin Day, Rodeo Austin, SXSW and ABC Kite Fest.

Austin ISD trustees met Feb. 24 for a board meeting at the new Austin ISD headquarters in South Austin. (Nicholas Cicale/Community Impact Newspaper)
Preliminary budgeting presentation shows Austin ISD could again face spending deficit in fiscal year 2020-21

The district is anticipating its next budget will include a spending deficit of about $16.3 million.

Repeal of straight-ticket voting could mean longer lines ahead in Travis County this fall

The Texas Legislature repealed straight-ticket voting in 2017, but the change was not implemented until this year. In November 2018, more than 60% of county voters chose the straight-ticket option.

The Palm School (Emma Freer/Community Impact Newspaper)
Travis County judge unimpressed with Austin’s initial bid to buy historic Palm School

The Palm School has been at the center of tension between the city and Travis County.

Downtown Austin (Christopher Neely/Community Impact Newspaper)
With initiative to curb fear of violent crime, Austin’s Downtown Commission recommends full staffing of police

After a rise in violent crime, the Austin Police Department has beefed up police presence downtown.

Stay Gold celebrates fifth anniversary

Stay Gold, located at 1910 E. Cesar Chavez St., Austin, celebrated its fifth anniversary Jan. 21. The east …

Method Hair moves to East Fourth Street

Method Hair, a salon offering haircuts and color, beard care, special oc-casion style and bridal makeup, …

Back to top