Sanctioned homeless camp proposal gains attention from Austin leaders as pressure mounts

City officials are facing growing pressure to address the growing visibility of homelessness in Austin. (Olivia Aldridge/Community Impact Newspaper)
City officials are facing growing pressure to address the growing visibility of homelessness in Austin. (Olivia Aldridge/Community Impact Newspaper)

City officials are facing growing pressure to address the growing visibility of homelessness in Austin. (Olivia Aldridge/Community Impact Newspaper)

The lack of shelter and housing for the city’s homeless community is an “emergency situation,” according to Austin Mayor Steve Adler, who stressed the need Jan. 25 for immediate solutions and joined other council members in proposing the city look into sanctioned homeless encampments as a tool.

The apparent warming up to sanctioned homeless encampments—an idea rejected by city staff in 2019—comes as City Council faces mounting pressure from residents and the governor to address the growing visibility of homeless camps throughout the city. Calls to reinstate the more restrictive version of its public camping ban that City Council repealed in June 2019 have intensified.

Sanctioned homeless encampments are plots of land designated by the government as a safe and encouraged place to camp, as opposed to encampments that have organically cropped up on public land, such as along East Cesar Chavez Street or East Riverside Drive. Gov. Greg Abbott set up a sanctioned encampment in Southeast Austin in November 2019 to initially mixed reviews; however, people in the homeless community, service providers and city leaders have since said the camp has had some moderate success but maintained it is not, in and of itself, a solution to homelessness.

Nothing is off the table

Answering a question posed by District 10 City Council Member Alison Alter during City Council’s work session, the city’s new homelessness strategy officer, Dianna Gray, told elected leaders that city-designated encampments were a possible tool as the city searches for solutions.

“I think it’s on the table. ... We can look all those options and come back to you with, at least initially, what we believe the pros and cons of those are,” Gray said.

She also clarified that the sanctioned encampments could only work if the long-term intent of the city is to provide housing.

Council Members Alter, Kathie Tovo and Ann Kitchen raised concerns during the work session about a growing number of encampments along the city’s hike and bike trails. Camping in public parkland is still prohibited under the city’s more relaxed camping ordinance. Gray said the city was not currently clearing encampments due to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention pandemic guidelines, which say doing so could increase the spread of the coronavirus.

“I think we might all agree that where some of that camping is happening right now is not where we would designate it if we had to designate it, but it is, [by] default, a designated camping area, and there has to be a better approach,” Alter said.

This is not the first time City Council has brought up sanctioned encampments as a potential tool. In the heated aftermath of the June 2019 decision to repeal the camping ban, some City Council members floated the proposal; however, Assistant City Manager Rodney Gonzalez, who was then overseeing the homelessness response, rejected the idea in a memo to City Council, saying instead the city would focus its resources on growing its shelter capacity.

During the Jan. 25 work session, Adler said the city’s efforts to increase its shelter and housing capacity have fallen short, and more immediate answers are now needed.

“I think it's significant that when we first looked at this we had pretty much taken off the table designated camping areas because that's not something that is generally desirable,” Adler said. “At the same time, we have an emergency situation and a need for rapid housing that may very well trump that.”

Growing pressure

Adler said he did not support efforts to reinstate the city’s more restrictive camping ordinance, as supported by the group Save Austin Now. The group, led by Travis County GOP Chair Matt Mackowiak, submitted a petition Jan. 19 with an alleged 27,000 signatures in support of putting the camping ban question on the May 1 ballot. The city clerk is still counting and validating the signatures.

Abbott said he also supports more restrictive camping. On Jan. 21, the Texas governor said he expects to “announce a statewide plan to address homelessness that will include a ban on camping as well as other ideas.”

Thomas Woodward, a formerly homeless Austin resident who worked for the street community-run Challenger Newspaper but is now housed, called the camping rules a “very complex situation.”

“It’s an unfortunate situation when we have bureaucrats in office who are disconnected and have no idea what these people have been through,” Woodward said. “A lot of people who are camping out have been through homeless services in Austin ... and got nothing from it. There is a lot of distrust between these people and the city. They just really want to be left alone.”

Woodward said he does not agree with allowing camps along places such as Cesar Chavez, the hike and bike trails, or parks and emphasized the need for the city and community to rebuild trust with the homeless population.

“They just need to house these people,” Woodward said. “They have the time and money.”

Matt Mollica, the executive director of the local Ending Community Homelessness Coalition, said sanctioned encampments could work if done empathetically.

“It’s not a solution for ending homelessness; it’s a step to provide a more dignified place for people to be in if it gives people access to noncongregate housing, access to food and hygiene,” Mollica said. “It’s not a replacement for recriminalizing homelessness.”

Mollica said Abbott’s sanctioned encampment in Southeast Austin works “to the extent that it is” because people have a choice whether they are there and people think it is a better solution than what they had previously.

Mollica said he supports providing more options while not taking away any rights. However, he said the city needs to build a more strategic approach, listen to people experiencing homelessness and provide better options to serve them.
By Christopher Neely
Christopher Neely is Community Impact's Austin City Hall reporter. A New Jersey native, Christopher moved to Austin in 2016 following years of community reporting along the Jersey Shore. His bylines have appeared in the Los Angeles Times, Baltimore Sun, USA Today and several other local outlets along the east coast.


Photo of a Joe's coffee barista handing off a drive-thru coffee
Jo's Coffee, other businesses bring new locations to north Central Austin

Four new businesses have recently opened in or are coming soon to north Central Austin.

A tree with fallen branches has fallen on a car in North Austin in the midst of Winter Storm Uri.
Does your emergency repair need a city permit? Here is how you can find out

The city of Austin has directed additional funds into programs to help some homeowners with repairs following February's winter storm.

Photo of Judge Brown in a mask and orange vest with megaphone
Travis County and 3 Central Texas neighbors to pilot mass vaccination site

Some 3,000 people will be vaccinated at a drive-thru event at the Circuit of The Americas this weekend.

Austin Water has lifted its boil-water notice for the city of Austin. (Iain Oldman/Community Impact Newspaper)
Austin Water lifts boil-water notice for all customers

Water quality tests have shown that city water is now safe to drink, and Austin Water continues to repair water mains and leaks.

Boil-water notices are still in place for some Austin residents. (Courtesy Pexels)
Austin dealing with ‘tens of thousands’ of water main breaks, officials say

Austin's water director said water main breaks during the winter storm were the likely culprit behind the draining of the city's reserves.

Photo of a desk with vials of Moderna vaccines on top
Austin Public Health resumes vaccinations, testing after weather-related delays

APH is currently in the process of rescheduling 3,300 vaccine appointments that were postponed beginning on Feb. 13.

Austin ISD staff at Pleasant Hill Elementary School distribute meals. (Nicholas Cicale/Community Impact Newspaper)
Austin ISD offering free meals to children and caregivers Feb. 25

Austin ISD is distributing meals at 33 campuses across the city of Austin.

Photo of cars driving in the snow
Travis County sees surge of 911 calls, emergencies during winter storm

Sheriff's Office patrollers also responded to heightened calls regarding vehicle collisions and distressed motorists.

Austin Resource Recovery resumed curbside pickup of items such as trash, recycling and composting Feb. 22. (Christopher Neely/Community Impact Newspaper)
Crews will collect extra material curbside for no charge as service resumes in Austin

On their scheduled days, customers can leave extra material, such as trash, recycling and composting, on the curb with no fees after winter storms caused delays in service.

Austin Water lifted its boil water notice for customers within its central pressure zone the morning of Feb. 22. (Amy Denney/Community Impact Newspaper)
Boil notice partially lifted in Austin, water service expected to be fully restored Feb. 22

Austin Water director Greg Meszaros said in a statement he expects service to be fully restored to all customers Feb. 22 and the boil notice to be fully lifted shortly thereafter.

Trees were covered in ice throughout Austin after freezing rain fell the night of Feb. 16. (Jack Flagler/Community Impact Newspaper)
Austin weekly roundup: This energy and water disaster won't be soon forgotten

As water service is slowly restored across the city, Austin remains under a boil notice and volunteers are handing out free cases of water to those in need.