Colleges across the state could be forced to make significant cuts in the next biennium as the state Senate has proposed bills to alleviate tuition costs at public universities while also suggesting a budget that could cut funding for public universities by 8 percent. Prioritized by Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, Senate Bills 18 and 19 aim to decrease tuition costs at public universities—such as Sam Houston State University, University of Houston and Texas A&M University—which are rising an average of 6 percent per year, according to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.


However, the Senate’s proposed budget would also cut state funding to public universities by $330 million from the last biennium, which could include cuts of tens of millions of dollars in programs at SHSU, UH and TAMU, said Garrett Groves, economic opportunity program director for the Austin-based Center for Public Policy Priorities.


COM_04_2017_01_L1“I do appreciate that the Senate is taking an honest look at college affordability [with] the bill on tuition and fees,” Groves said. “My biggest concern is the declining state appropriations.”


Local colleges are concerned about what the legislation and proposed budget cuts could mean for their funding and suggest tuition increases over the past few years are a result of less state aid and the need to provide more services to students.


“We’re being asked to do more with less,” said Matthew Fuller, associate professor of higher education leadership at SHSU.


TARGETING TUITION


In January, Sen. Kel Seliger, R-Amarillo, filed SB 18 and SB 19. SB 18  would eliminate a rule requiring public universities to use a portion of tuition revenue to fund scholarships for students with financial need; SB 19 would freeze tuition prices for students for two years.


“Senate Bills 18 and 19 are critical to ensure higher education tuition and fees do not continue to outpace what hardworking Texans earn,” Patrick said. “Making college more affordable for all Texans continues to be one of my top priorities this legislative session.”


Tuition freezes could allow students to project what the cost of a bachelor’s degree would be, said Denise Cipolla, Conroe ISD coordinator for guidance and counseling. However, she said SB 18 could be a hindrance to families in need of  financial assistance.


“Many students who are going to college have to have some type of financial assistance,” Cipolla said. “If they aren’t able to tap into resources at the  financial aid [office] once at the university, I think that they may choose a different school that is able to provide them more resources.”


Another bill, SB 543, also filed by Seliger, would require state schools to meet performance-based metrics before being allowed to raise tuition. Language from this bill has since been added to SB 19.


COM_04_2017_01_L2“Tuition relief and predictability is necessary for Texas students and families,” Seliger said.


Since House Bill 3015 was passed by the 78th Texas Legislature—allowing public universities to vary tuition rates—tuition has risen at public universities from 2003-15 by as much as 178 percent. Students paid a statewide average of $1,687 more per semester in 2015 than they did in 2003, according to the THECB.


At UH, tuition rose from $2,266 to $5,404 per semester from 2003-15, a 139 percent increase. Meanwhile, tuition at TAMU and SHSU increased 108 percent and 156 percent, respectively.


However, the universities attribute such increases to a decrease in state funding per student, enrollment growth and an increase in costs. Fuller said the state’s funding per student declined by 43 percent from 1987-2012. To bridge the gap, colleges roll some of the cost into tuition.


“The No. 1 reason [for tuition increases] is the support of higher education is declining, and we’ve got to make that up somewhere or we’ve got to cut services,” Fuller said. “Since [students] don’t want us to cut services because they want certain degrees, we’ve got to make it up somewhere.”


SB 18 and SB 19 were passed by the Senate in early April and have been sent to the House to be reviewed. If passed, these laws would go into effect Sept. 1. 


Raymund Paredes, higher education commissioner for the THECB, said it would be difficult to assess how the bills could affect universities and students. He said attempts in other states, such as California and Montana, to freeze tuition costs have only resulted in temporarily offsetting costs.


“Sometimes the tuition freezes essentially result in delaying increases for a couple of years, and then when the regulation expires, the institutions raise the tuition to exactly the same level that they would have if they had raised tuition incrementally,” Paredes said.


CUTTING COSTS


The Senate’s budget—which was approved on March 28 by the Senate—would provide about $20.233 billion to higher education funding throughout the state, which is $11 million less than the last biennium, or 0.1 percent less, according to the Center for Public Policy Priorities. While Groves said community colleges would not see much of a change in funding, the changes in funding means public universities would receive about $330 million in cuts.


Many of the cuts could come from special items, or programs funded as line items by the state’s budget outside of the appropriations formula, Groves said.


The state funded more than $1.1 billion of these special items across 37 public universities from 2016-17 in its previous budget, according to the Center for Public Policy Priorities. That included more than $13.6 million in special items at the TAMU campus in College Station over the biennium, nearly $33.2 million in special items at the UH main campus in Houston and nearly $25.3 million for SHSU’s Huntsville campus.


Carlos Hernandez, vice president for finance and operations at SHSU, said the cuts to special items could affect university activities, including museum operations, the small business development center and environmental testing as well as the criminal management and law-enforcement management institutes.


COM_04_2017_01_L3Jason Smith, vice president for governmental relations for UH, said the Senate’s budget would cut 7.8 percent of UH’s appropriations, which includes $22.5 million in cuts to the university and $35.6 million to the entire UH system. Most of the cuts would come from special items, which he said pay for many of the university’s research initiatives.


Smith said if the state appropriations cuts are approved on top of SB 19, the university would have to make some tough decisions. 


“For us to not have the option to make up some of that revenue through modest increases in tuition, even to keep up with annual cost increases in higher education, is concerning,” he said. “We’re sensitive to our students’ ability to handle any increase. But if all of these things happen together, it’s going to be very difficult to provide the same quality of education going forward.”


Groves said the Legislature increased higher education funding last session by about the same as the Senate is proposing to cut this year. UH, TAMU and SHSU saw funding increase by 7.36 percent, 15.46 percent and 21.8 percent, respectively, from 2014-15 to 2016-17, officials said.


However, despite the recent increase, Groves said the state’s contribution to higher education funding has steadily dropped over the years. The state appropriations per full-time-equivalent student have fallen from an average of $7,767 in 2000 to $5,521 in 2015, according to the Center for Public Policy Priorities.


The House’s budget—which the House passed April 7—provides $20.518 billion for higher education funding, a $273 million increase  from last biennium, according to the Center for Public Policy Priorities. The budget would cut $44.2 million from special items.


Smith said UH is hopeful the Legislature will ultimately pass a budget closer to the House’s version. 


“There are certainly some things that can be done to fill that gap,” he said. “It’s a matter of whether there is the political will to do it.”


COM_04_2017_01_L4AFFORDING EDUCATION


Despite decreases in state aid and rapid tuition growth, Texas ranks seventh nationwide in higher education affordability, according to the 2016 College Affordability Diagnosis from the Penn Graduate School of Education. Students enrolling in a public four-year university in Texas need to borrow more than $4,400 annually to pay for costs.


CISD has seen an increase in the number of students who choose to attend community colleges and then transfer to four-year universities in order to save money, Cipolla said, adding the best way students can pay for college is by looking into all facets of  financial aid.


“There are many types of financial aid, scholarships and grants that are available that students never actually apply for,” Cipolla said.


Additional reporting by Emily Donaldson, Beth Marshall and Chris Shelton