Q&A: Constitutional law expert discusses COVID-19 orders, enforcement

Many government orders implemented in Texas this year were built on stable legal footing, according to Seth Chandler, a law professor at the University of Houston. (Community Impact staff)
Many government orders implemented in Texas this year were built on stable legal footing, according to Seth Chandler, a law professor at the University of Houston. (Community Impact staff)

Many government orders implemented in Texas this year were built on stable legal footing, according to Seth Chandler, a law professor at the University of Houston. (Community Impact staff)

State and local leaders in Texas have implemented a variety of orders throughout the COVID-19 pandemic this year aimed at limiting the spread of the coronavirus.

Seth Chandler, a constitutional law expert and a professor of law at the University of Houston Law Center, spoke with Community Impact Newspaper on July 21 about these orders and their legality in the midst of a public health crisis. This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

What tools do officials have to address emergency public health crises in Texas?

We have something called 'area quarantines,' where a local health authority can basically say, 'Hey, in this jurisdiction, nobody’s moving.' I believe—although it is not as clear as I would like—we could have conditional area quarantines that say, ‘You’re not moving unless you comply with sensible health precautions, like wearing a mask.' And then, we have various orders from the governor pursuant to his own authority. ... We do actually have a fair amount of tools, and violation of these quarantines is, in theory, a criminal offense, ... but instead, we’ve been very timid, almost embarrassed, to enforce reasonable public health safety matters.

Why have these concepts and their enforcement proven to be controversial this year, and is there any legal uncertainty surrounding these measures?


Unfortunately, this somehow or other got linked with politics, and there developed a pernicious and completely bogus notion that you have some sort of constitutional right to not engage in public health safety measures if you don’t want to—that it’s your constitutional right not to wear a mask in public, for example. And that is just completely false. That is an imaginary constitutional right. The Supreme Court has said on several occasions that state governments have very broad authority, almost frightening authority, to restrict behavior in order to prevent the spread of pandemics. Just as we have laws against speeding—because speeding poses a risk to the public, even though every time you speed you don’t hurt somebody—we can have laws that say, ‘If you’re out in public, you’re going to wear a mask.’ It doesn’t mean that if you didn’t wear a mask, you would actually hurt somebody, but there’s a substantial enough risk and it’s a minimal enough burden for most people that it is completely reasonable to have people wear masks.

Does that state authority reasonably apply to other restrictions we’ve seen this year relating to gatherings or limits on business operations?

If the local public health authority can order an area quarantine, ... then surely, it has the power to take the lesser step of saying, ‘Okay, we’re going to let some businesses open, but not others. We’re going to let people gather in ways that are safe, but we’re not going to let people gather in ways that are going to endanger themselves, clog up the hospitals and spread it to other innocent people and potentially kill or seriously injure them.’ ... It seems logical to me that if you can order broader area quarantines, you can order lesser steps that aren’t as drastic and harmful to the economy.

Have you seen government in Texas approach these orders in a legally sound way this year?

There are certainly limits on what governments can do. It has to be rational; it has to be equally applied to people. But I am not familiar with examples of overreach in Texas. In fact, we’ve had under-reach in Texas, and my proof of that is we’ve got a skyrocketing COVID rate in this state that is worse than in many other states.

Several agencies throughout the state have publicly announced that they will not enforce some orders due to concerns over the language in the rules. Are those concerns justified?

Law enforcement should make an assessment as to whether an order is lawful. But unless the order is crazy, it seems to me it’s their job to enforce it and let a court decide whether the enforcement of the order is unconstitutional or otherwise violates peoples’ rights. I don’t like the idea of local sheriffs picking and choosing which particular laws they think are constitutional or not. I’m not saying they should never do that, but I must say, I’m a little skeptical that the views on the constitutionality or legality of these provisions may align with political beliefs about whether wearing masks is a good idea.

Some city and county officials throughout the state have opposed masking, business or gathering orders or interpreted them more as guidelines than hard rules in their jurisdictions. Should public officials approach these orders with that type of critical view?

I think that’s an extremely destructive perspective, and it’s also, I would add, a very selfish perspective. ... This should not be a purely county-by-county decision. It affects people very much outside of the county. Unlike a zoning decision or some sort of barbershop licensing decision, it’s a decision that potentially affects people throughout the state.

What could governments do to strengthen their current orders in a legal manner this year?

I think serious mask enforcement would go a long way. ... If someone’s not wearing a mask in public, you treat them the same way that you would a drunk driver, which is: You have them spend a little time in prison to reflect on whether that was a good idea. And I think if that were done publicly enough, it would deter the sort of selfish, destructive behavior that I saw many people engaging in. ... You’re free to criticize masking requirements as much as you want just as much as you’re free to criticize speeding laws as much as you want. But that doesn’t give you the right to either forego the mask or drive 100 miles an hour.
By Ben Thompson
Ben joined Community Impact Newspaper in January 2019 and is a reporter for The Woodlands edition.


MOST RECENT

The Woodlands Township board of directors will hold its next meeting in person on Oct. 22. (Andrew Christman/Community Impact Newspaper)
The Woodlands Township balanced $3.5M in lost revenue with $7.9M less spending, officials said

"Even in a worst-case scenario we're going to come out where we forecasted, so that's good news," said Monique Sharp, The Woodlands Township's assistant general manager for finance and administration.

Precinct 4 Commissioner Jack Cagle announced Sept. 29 that he has tested positive for COVID-19. (Courtesy Jack Cagle)
Harris County Precinct 4 Commissioner Jack Cagle tests positive for COVID-19

Precinct 4 Commissioner Jack Cagle announced Sept. 29 that he has tested positive for COVID-19.

Harris County Commissioners Court unanimously agreed to a proposed overall Harris County tax rate of $0.59920 for fiscal year 2020-21, a decrease of $0.01250 from the overall Harris County tax rate of $0.61170 in FY 2019-20. (Courtesy Fotolia)
Harris County commissioners set proposed FY 2020-21 tax rates, schedule public hearing and adoption dates

Harris County taxpayers could see a tax rate decrease in fiscal year 2020-21 after commissioners set the proposed tax rates for each of the county's four taxing entities.

Austin-based Tecovas will bring its 10th retail location to Market Street in The Woodlands on Oct. 9. (Courtesy Tecovas)
A new bootmaker, a builder, and a bookkeeper's anniversary: 6 business updates in The Woodlands area

Several new businesses are now open or launching soon around The Woodlands.

Less than 1,600 cases are currently active in the county, a drop of more than 5% since Sept. 21. (Community Impact Newspaper staff)
Active COVID-19 cases in Montgomery County drop 5.5% on Sept. 22-28; 3 new deaths reported

The county's cumulative case count passed 10,900 on Sept. 28, more than 14% of which remain active.

Austin, Brazoria, Fort Bend, Waller and Wharton county judges joined a Greater Houston Partnership panel discussion Sept. 25. (Screenshot via Greater Houston Partnership)
Greater Houston judges discuss COVID-19 management, economic recovery

Leaders from Austin, Brazoria, Fort Bend, Waller and Wharton counties joined a Greater Houston Partnership panel in late September to discuss COVID-19.

Lone Star College has been awarded a $750,000 grant through the Department of Education. (Danica Smithwick/Community Impact Newspaper)
Lone Star College awarded $750,000 federal grant

The grant is anticipated to be sustained for five years.

Members of the Harris County Commissioners Court are expected to discuss where to set the property tax rate for fiscal year 2020-21 at a Sept. 29 meeting, and a recently released recommendation from the county's budget office suggests a no-new-revenue rate could be proposed to support the county's general needs. (Courtesy Fotolia)
Harris County budget office recommends tax rate decrease ahead of Sept. 29 discussion

However, officials are proposing a tax rate increase for the county's flood control district.

ballot box, 2020 voter guide
November 2020 election: Who's on the ballot and how to vote in Montgomery County

Races at the national, state, county and local levels will be contested in the Nov. 3 general election.

Amazon 4-star's in-store offerings include books, games, electronics and home products. (Courtesy Amazon)
Amazon 4-star store opens at The Woodlands Mall and more business, community news from September

Read business and community news from September from Community Impact Newspaper's coverage of the Houston area.

The Woodlands Township board of directors held a virtual meeting Sept. 23. (Screenshot via The Woodlands Township)
The Woodlands Township plans to begin holding in-person board meetings again in October

After six months of virtual meetings, The Woodlands Township board of directors meetings will resume in-person with several safety precautions and screening procedures in place.