Houston area groups propose plan for how third Hurricane Harvey relief package should be distributed

2

As the U.S. House of Representatives is preparing to pass a third and presumably final Hurricane Harvey relief package within the coming days, state and local officials are fighting to make sure future flood control projects are funded.

Congress passed $15 billion in Harvey relief in September, and an additional $36.5 billion was passed in October to be distributed across Texas, Florida and Puerto Rico.

However, that money was mainly set aside for the Federal Emergency Management Agency to provide relief to individuals and to pay off debt accumulated by the National Flood Insurance Program. Funding for flood-proofing the affected communities—including for reservoir construction and home buyouts—is still greatly needed, according to state officials.

Gov. Greg Abbott has called for $61.8 billion in additional funding for Texas in the next package to fund projects identified in the Rebuild Texas plan. About 60 percent of Abbott’s requested funding would go toward flood-proofing to prepare for future storms.

A Commission to Rebuild Texas was established to seek input from local officials in the affected areas to determine what projects need to be prioritized.

Although the Rebuild Texas plan would improve flood control in the City of Houston and around the Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, a group of local organizations are advocating that the funding be used to provide more comprehensive flood protection for the rest of Harris County.

The group—which includes the West Houston Association, North Houston Association, Greater Houston Builders Association, American Council of Engineering Companies of Houston and the Katy Area Economic Development Council—released A Comprehensive Flood Protection Plan for a Better Houston, which is aligned with plans laid out in Rebuild Texas but differs in several key areas.

Augustus Campbell, president of the West Houston Association, made a presentation to the Cypress Creek Flood Control Coalition Nov. 15. Here are several proposals for how Harris County should use federal funding as laid out in the Better Houston plan:

Reservoirs

Both the Rebuild Texas plan and the Better Houston plan make the construction of new reservoirs and the restoration of the Addicks and Barker reservoirs key parts of the solution.

Both plans call for the construction of a third reservoir in the Cypress Creek watershed to alleviate pressure on the two existing reservoirs, and both plans call for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to complete a restoration report for Addicks and Barker to determine the best way to restore them to their original capacity.

However, Campbell said because the proposed reservoir is expected to have little benefit on Cypress Creek, the Better Houston plan calls for another reservoir to be built on Little Cypress Creek, at a cost of roughly $300 million, which would slow the movement of water traveling downstream. The location of the Little Cypress Creek reservoir has not been identified yet, but Campbell said there are several options along the creek where land is available for such a project.

Increasing bayou conveyance

A top goal of the Better Houston plan involves improving conveyance to the point where 12 inches of rainfall runoff can pass through every bayou in the Greater Houston area within 24 hours, Campbell said. He identified Sims Bayou as an example of where this goal has already been reached.

The Sims Bayou project, which was completed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in 2015 at a cost of $395 million, paid for itself in terms of how much damage was prevented during Harvey, Campbell said.

“Zero homes flooded along Sims Bayou during Harvey,” he said. “The bayou did not even overflow its banks.”

In the Rebuild Texas plan, funding for conveyance improvements is targeted at shovel-ready projects along White Oak, Hunting, Brays and Clear Creek bayous. The Better Houston plan calls for significantly more funding for conveyance improvements—around $20 billion total to complete improvements along all major bayous, including Cypress Creek and Little Cypress Creek.

Several conveyance projects are already included in the Harris County Flood Control District’s capital improvements plan—including the Little Cypress Creek Frontier Program—but have not been fully funded.

“If all we do is build the third reservoir, we’ve absolutely made a mistake,” Campbell said. “It’s really important that we continue to beat that drum for conveyance. If you have good conveyance through your area, you will have the most efficient and resilient solution to flooding.”

Buyouts

Both plans call for a significant amount of money to be spent on home buyouts.

The key difference in the Better Houston plan is that buyouts are targeted at homes along bayous that experience repeated flooding, Campbell said. Buying out these homes serves an additional strategic purpose in that it also allows the county to pursue conveyance improvements along those bayous, he said.

The Rebuild Texas plan calls for about $14 billion to be spent on buyouts compared to $8.5 billion in the Better Houston plan. Campbell said the Better Houston plan does not recommend buyouts for properties behind the Addicks and Barker reservoirs.

Funding

The federal cost share of all projects identified in the Better Houston plan is $28.8 billion. The plan also calls for a $1 billion contribution from the State of Texas and a $2.2 billion contribution from Harris County, which would be raised with an 4 cent tax rate increase for flood control projects. The plan and accompanying bonds could be placed on the May 2018 ballot for voters to support or reject.

Share this story
2 comments
COMMENT
  1. Great work on Sims bayou, and great point on conveyance importance. I would like to add one comment: Buffalo Bayou has earth banks and meanders naturally. It is the bottleneck. It’s banks were severely eroded and contributed to the majority of sediments in the shipping channel during Hurricane Harvey. Many residents along the bayou were flooded. If the conveyance capacity of Buffalo Bayou is tripled, the third reservoir may not be needed. Should upgrading Buffalo Bayou be considered as the first priority?

  2. We want to be cautious about the use of eminent domain to take private property, on a back handed land grab. The trails on the Buffalo Bayou and Spring Creek Greenway, only made things worse. Sold to the public on saving the environment and flood control and turned many of the area’s, into trash dumping grounds, when it flooded poured human rest rooms waste into the creeks. Losing a lifetime of tax payments from when it was in the hands of private ownership. The cost to build trails that get washed away with each flood and who knows the cost of the legal bills. A savy reporter would look at the total cost of the trails, loss in tax dollars, repair and yearly and overall cost. With those funds, real flood control work could have been done and paid for.
    https://www.yourconroenews.com/neighborhood/woodlands/news/article/After-flooding-future-unclear-for-Spring-Creek-12204650.php

    1. the legal process of transferring property from one owner to another.
    “protective measures that might be taken before the conveyance is concluded”
    o a legal document effecting

Leave A Reply

Shawn Arrajj
Shawn Arrajj serves as the editor of the Cy-Fair edition of Community Impact Newspaper where he covers the Cy-Fair and Jersey Village communities. He mainly writes about development, transportation and issues in Harris County.
Back to top