Local, state officials rethink stance on red-light cameras

3

Some Texas lawmakers are seeking to outlaw the use of red-light cameras, which have generated nearly $2 million since 2008 for traffic safety-related projects in the city of Southlake. The city has a contract through May 2024 for four cameras installed along Southlake Boulevard. Neither Grapevine nor Colleyville uses red-light cameras.

At least three bills filed in the Texas Legislature seek to outright ban these and similar devices or further regulate them. Gov. Greg Abbott has also recommended a ban, labeling them as costly and ineffective. He also cites issues with their constitutionality and transparency.

State Rep. Giovanni Capriglione, R-Southlake, shares the governor’s concerns. The cameras presume the vehicle owner is guilty without a proper trial, he said. Capriglione’s district covers the city of Southlake.

“It is a due process issue,” he said.

Driving in Southlake

Southlake resident Frank Allen said he supports eliminating the cameras. Allen received a violation notice in 2017. He was at an intersection in the city when he saw another car approaching behind him. Fearing a rear-end collision, Allen said he ran the red light.

“If a policeman had been standing there, they would not have given me a ticket,” he said. “They would have understood what happened. … What’s missing is context.”

Allen said he believes the red-light cameras are more about profit than safety. But Mayor Laura Hill said revenue was never part of the conversation when City Council discussed their implementation. Instead, she said, the city was grappling with increased traffic on Southlake Boulevard.

“We were desperate to get a handle on slowing the traffic down on [Southlake Boulevard],” said Hill, who was a council member in 2008 and supportive of red-light cameras at the time.

In the beginning traffic slowed. But people eventually shifted back to old habits, Hill said.

Southlake has collected a little more than $9.45 million from fiscal year 2008-09 to fiscal year 2016-17 from its red-light camera program, according to records. However, the city only retained about $1.97 million. Another $1.97 million went to the state. The remaining $5.51 million paid for services provided by Redflex Traffic Systems, according to data provided by the city. Redflex operates the cameras and is responsible for processing violation notices and collecting delinquent accounts.

In recent years the debate over red-light cameras shifted to focus more on distracted driving as well as personal privacy versus public surveillance.

Because of these changes, Hill said she would now support a potential ban on red-light cameras. But Southlake has a long-term contract with Redflex, and the city cannot end its red-light camera program unless the Legislature intervenes, she said.

Safety at intersections

At one point Southlake had six red-light cameras, but two were deactivated after some roadway improvements and construction work, Assistant Police Chief Ashleigh Casey said.

The remaining cameras can be found on Southlake Boulevard, where it intersects with Kimball Avenue, Pearson Lane, Carroll Avenue and Peytonville Avenue, according to the city website.

The city chose these intersections because of their frequent red-light violations, Casey said.

The cameras have helped law-enforcement officers monitor roadways and encourage drivers to be more mindful when driving.

They also helped former Southlake resident Chris Teape resolve a liability dispute after another car collided with his. Both drivers argued the other one ran the red light.

“The red-light camera is what ended up dictating that I did not run the red light,” Teape said. “I think in a lot of these high-traffic areas, particularly where they have a lot of accidents, I certainly think [the cameras]have their place.”

Without cameras, the Southlake Police Department would have to resort to other strategies, such as re-timing traffic signals and stationing officers at intersections to watch for violations, Casey said.

A contentious issue

Debates over red-light cameras have also reached the Texas judicial system, where multiple lawsuits are pending.

Louisiana resident James Watson received a violation notice claiming he ran a red light in Southlake. Watson said he was not the one driving, according to court documents. He paid the $75 penalty but filed a class-action lawsuit in 2015 against Southlake, 52 other cities, three red-light camera service providers and the state of Texas.

The case went to federal court before it was remanded back to state court, where Judge Susan McCoy of the 153rd District Court in Tarrant County ultimately dismissed every defendant who was not directly involved in the incident, except for Southlake and Redflex. McCoy then also dismissed Southlake based on governmental immunity.

Watson’s attorney, Russell Bowman, said the rulings have been appealed. The Fort Worth Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in November, according to filed documents.

Meanwhile the Texas Supreme Court is set to hear a similar case involving the city of Willis in Montgomery County at an unspecified later date.

Should Watson win his case, he and others like him who paid penalties for violations processed by red-light cameras could see their money refunded, said attorney Scott Stewart, who also represents Watson. It would apply to anyone who has paid these fines going back two years prior to when the lawsuit was originally filed in April 2015.

The state and cities have collected more than $327 million in net revenue from red-light cameras from Sept. 1, 2007, to Aug. 31, 2018, according documents from the Texas Comptroller’s Office. This does not include the amounts that red-light camera service providers have earned over the years.

Cities may use their share of the revenue on traffic safety programs, according to the Texas Transportation Code.

In the past, Southlake has used the funds to improve crosswalks, install additional signage, re-paint stripes for school zones and pay for lab testing in drunken-driving cases, Casey said.

If the cameras were to be deactivated, the city of Southlake would have to find other ways to pay for these types of projects, she said.

“We would still strive to make sure we’re still providing the same service levels,” Casey said. “We would just need to find different ways to manage those costs.”

Share this story
3 comments
COMMENT
  1. James C. Walker

    Red light cameras are for-profit rackets that target mostly safe drivers and take their money with virtually no due process protections. Texas residents need to call their state Representatives, Senators, and the Governor to politely but firmly insist on a new law immediately banning all red light cameras statewide.
    James C. Walker, National Motorists Association

  2. Byron Schirmbeck

    I appreciate the mayor saying she would end the camera program now if she thought she could. There are several ways out of the contract without the legislature getting involved. She knows that, let’s see what she does.

  3. Red light cameras are an overstep. I get the fact that it collects taxes from non-residents to ease the burden on the local tax payer. All that said I avoid these intersections as much as I can. Too many cars are slamming to stop or accelerating through. I spend more time watching in my rear view mirror to see who is going to rear end me then watching the intersection itself. There is no natural flow of traffic.
    As Mayor Tate in Grapevine said ‘they send an unfriendly message about your town” and he will not have them as long as he is Mayor.
    Simply put unsafe, unfriendly and overreaching. Turn them off

Leave A Reply

Renee Yan
Renee Yan graduated May 2017 from the University of Texas in Arlington with a degree in journalism, joining Community Impact Newspaper as a reporter in July.
Back to top