Local colleges are concerned about what the legislation and proposed budget cuts could mean for their funding and suggest tuition increases over the past few years are a result of less state aid and the need to provide more services to students.

“We’re being asked to do more with less,” said Matthew Fuller, associate professor of higher education leadership at SHSU.

Targeting Tuition

In January, Sen. Kel Seliger, R-Amarillo, filed SB 18 and SB 19. SB 18 would eliminate a rule requiring public universities to use a portion of tuition revenue to fund scholarships for students with financial need; SB 19 would freeze tuition prices for students for two years.

“Senate Bills 18 and 19 are critical to ensure higher education tuition and fees do not continue to outpace what hardworking Texans earn,” Patrick said. “Making college more affordable for all Texans continues to be one of my top priorities this legislative session.”

Another bill, SB 543, also filed by Seliger, would require state schools to meet performance-based metrics before being allowed to raise tuition. Language from this bill has since been added to SB 19.

“Tuition relief and predictability is necessary for Texas students and families,” Seliger said.

Since House Bill 3015 was passed by the 78th Texas Legislature—allowing public universities to vary tuition rates—tuition has risen at public universities from 2003-15 by as much as 178 percent. Students paid a statewide average of $1,687 more per semester in 2015 than they did in 2003, according to the THECB.

At UH, total tuition rose from $2,266 per semester to $5,404 per semester from 2003-15, a 139 percent increase. Meanwhile, tuition at TAMU and SHSU increased 108 percent and 156 percent, respectively.

However, the universities attribute such increases to a decrease in state funding per student, enrollment growth and an increase in costs. Fuller said the state’s funding per student declined by 43 percent from 1987-2012. To bridge the gap, colleges roll some of the cost into tuition.

“The No. 1 reason [for tuition increases] is the support of higher education is declining, and we’ve got to make that up somewhere or we’ve got to cut services,” Fuller said. “Since [students] don’t want us to cut services because they want certain degrees, we’ve got to make it up somewhere.”

SB 18 and SB 19 were passed by the Senate in early April and have been sent to the House to be reviewed. If passed, these laws would go into effect Sept. 1. 

Raymund Paredes, higher education commissioner for the THECB, said it would be difficult to assess how the bills could affect universities and students. He said attempts in other states, such as California and Montana, to freeze tuition costs have only resulted in temporarily offsetting costs.

“Sometimes the tuition freezes essentially result in delaying increases for a couple of years, and then when the regulation expires, the institutions raise the tuition to exactly the same level that they would have if they had raised tuition incrementally from one year,” Paredes said.

State Sen. Paul Bettencourt, R-Houston, is a co-author of both SB 19 and SB 543. He described them as an attempt to recognize the obvious.

“I think SB 19 is kind of a temporary pass,” he said, “When you see SB 543, you see some long-term measurements.”

Bettencourt said the general economic downturn in the Houston area and in the state puts an added emphasis on the need to better regulate tuition increases.

“There is generally much more focus on those types of problems in an economic downturn than in an upturn,” he said. “I think a good bill will come out of the Senate.”

Cutting Costs

The Senate’s proposed budget—which was approved March 28 by the Senate—would provide $20.233 billion to higher ed funding, which is $11 million less than the last biennium, or 0.1 percent, according to the Center for Public Policy Priorities. While Groves said community colleges would not see much of a change in funding, public universities would receive about $330 million in cuts.

Many of the cuts could come from special items, or programs funded as line items by the state’s budget outside of the appropriations formula, Groves said.

The state funded more than $1.1 billion of these special items across 37 public universities from 2016-17 in its previous budget, according to data provided by the Center for Public Policy Priorities. That included more than $13.6 million in special items at TAMU’s campus in College Station over the biennium, nearly $33.2 million in special items at the UH main campus and nearly $25.3 million for SHSU’s Huntsville campus.

Carlos Hernandez, vice president for finance and operations at SHSU, said the cuts to special items could affect university activities, including museum operations, the small-business development center and environmental testing as well as the criminal management and law-enforcement management institutes.

Jason Smith, vice president for governmental relations for UH, said the Senate’s budget would cut 7.8 percent of UH’s appropriations, which includes $22.5 million in cuts to the university and $35.6 million to the UH system. Most of the cuts would come from special items, which he said pay for many of the university’s research initiatives.

Smith said if the state appropriations cuts are approved on top of SB 19, the university would have to make some tough decisions. 

“For us to not have the option to make up some of that revenue through modest increases in tuition, even to keep up with annual cost increases in higher education, is concerning,” he said.

Groves said the Legislature increased higher education funding last session by roughly the same rate the Senate is proposing to cut it this session. UH, TAMU and SHSU saw state aid increase by 7.36 percent, 15.46 percent and 21.8 percent, respectively, from the 2014-15 biennium to 2016-17, university officials said.

However, despite the recent increase, Groves said the state’s contribution to higher education funding has steadily dropped over the years. The state appropriations per full-time-equivalent student have fallen from an average of $7,767 in 2000 to $5,521 in 2015, according to the Center for Public Policy Priorities.

At TAMU, the portion of the university system’s operating costs composed of state aid has dropped from 55 to 38 percent from 2002-16, according to university officials. Meanwhile, the state’s contributions to the UH system decreased from 64 to 24 percent from 1994-2016.

The House’s budget—which the House passed April 7—provides $20.518 billion for higher education funding, a $273 million increase from last biennium, according to the Center for Public Policy Priorities. The budget would cut $44.2 million from special items.

Smith said UH is hopeful the Legislature will ultimately pass a budget closer to the House’s version. 

“There are certainly some things that can be done to fill that gap,” he said. “It’s a matter of whether there is the political will to do it.”

Affording Education

Despite decreases in state aid and rapid tuition growth over the years, Texas ranks seventh nationwide in higher education affordability, according to the 2016 College Affordability Diagnosis from the Penn Graduate School of Education. Students enrolling in a public four-year university in Texas need to borrow more than $4,400 annually to pay for expenses.

Paredes said one of the greatest challenges for colleges and families is finding enough funding to cover all students in need of tuition relief. He said as grant money on the state and federal levels falls short, higher education officials will have to find solutions.

“We recognize that the current model of relying on either federal grant aid or state grant aid, primarily through the Texas grant program, will be very difficult to sustain in the future,” he said.

In the meantime, Cy-Fair ISD provides counseling for students to guide them through the process of applying for college, including how to navigate tuition and financial aid. The district hosts workshops on how to qualify for financial aid through the Free Application for Federal Student Aid every October.