Bail bond reform poses significant shift in Harris County criminal justice system


After a final hearing set for late October, a landmark settlement in Harris County could make bail reforms permanent and set the stage for similar changes across the country.

In 2016, three people charged with misdemeanors—which include crimes such as drug possession, theft and driving while intoxicated—filed a lawsuit against Harris County, alleging it unfairly jailed misdemeanor defendants who could not afford bail. In 2017, Lee Rosenthal, chief district judge of the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of Texas, declared the county’s bail system unconstitutional.

As a result, Harris County changed its bail practices to grant personal bonds for most misdemeanor arrestees in 2017, a change known as Local Rule 9. The rule requires pretrial release of all misdemeanor arrestees, excluding offenses such as domestic violence or assault.

The county initially appealed the 2017 ruling, but after a slate of Democrats were elected to judge and commissioner seats last November, the county began working with the plaintiffs in the case on a settlement.

In a preliminary ruling issued Sept. 5 on the county’s appeal, Rosenthal affirmed the settlement and consent decree, despite objections from District Attorney Kim Ogg, Precinct 3 Commissioner Steve Radack, Precinct 4 Commissioner Jack Cagle, the Harris County Domestic Violence Coordinating Council and the Harris County Bondsmen Association. The fairness hearing Oct. 28 will be the last chance for the judge to weigh in on concerns.

“[The settlement] is not very fair to victims,” Cagle said.

The decree requires the county to spend $250,000 per year in services to help arrestees make their court dates and to commit to a study to better understand why dates are missed. After the study, the county must spend $850,000 on solutions.

Ogg and Cagle said Local Rule 9 already addresses the plaintiff’s concerns in the original lawsuit. They said the settlement—which requires the county to offer defendants rides to court and to implement a text message system reminding them of their court dates—is unnecessary.

Additionally, some officials are concerned the bail reform may be indirectly leading to more felons being released on personal bonds. From 2014-18, the total number of misdemeanor and felony defendants released on personal bond jumped 371.17% and is continuing to grow this year, according to a report by Harris County Pretrial Services.

“At the core of the system, you need to have [local]judges to review every case to decide who are the ones who are at risk to hurt somebody,” Cagle said at the July 30 meeting.

On a countywide level, bail reform could alleviate overcrowding at the Harris County Jail, which houses more than 8,000 inmates on any given day, said Darryl Coleman, the chief of Harris County’s criminal justice command. According to data from the Texas Commission on Jail Standards, the average monthly number of people held in the Harris County Jail pretrial for misdemeanors dropped by about 40% from 2016-19, during the time reform initiatives were implemented.

However, the changes across the criminal justice system could take years to realize, said Precinct 1 Commissioner Rodney Ellis, who likened the settlement to “Brown v. Board of Education,” the landmark Supreme Court civil rights case in 1954 that led to the integration of public schools nationwide.

“It took decades … maybe a century to put this system in place that has been ruled unconstitutional, and we needed to make sure we were thoughtful in what we do to change it because you cannot dismantle a system like this overnight,” Ellis said at the July 30 Commissioners Court meeting.

Share this story
  1. One important fact that this article fails to mention is the success rate of Harris county’s new program. The success rate of any pretrial program is measure by how many people show up for court. That is the only reason they are released in the first place, on a “promise” to appear. According to court statistics over 60% of defendants released on these OR bonds are NOT showing up for court. So yes, it is great that there has been a 341% increase in PR bonds and it is great that the jail population is down, but ignoring the fact that criminals are taking advantage of this program and not showing up for court is irresponsible. What do you think these folks are doing when they don’t show up for court? They aren’t sitting at a desk…they are right back on the street committing more crimes. This entire bail reform narrative is based on a complete lie. There are NO poor people languishing in jail. Most people do bail out…if there is someone that is in jail because they lack the resources than pretrial services is supposed to help that person…not the bail industry. Why doesn’t someone look into why pretrial is not helping those people it was designed to help. That would be a reform worth looking at. Meanwhile let bail agents do what they do the maintain the integrity of our criminal justice system.

Leave A Reply

Matt Dulin
Matt joined Community Impact Newspaper in January 2018 and is the City Editor for Houston's Inner Loop editions.
Back to top