The three Democratic members of the court who supported the motion—Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo, and Precinct 1 and 2 commissioners Rodney Ellis and Adrian Garcia—said they saw value in the added flexibility in how that money can now be spent. While money collected by the toll road authority can only be spent on debt and transportation infrastructure, money in the LGC can be spent on a wider variety of projects, including flood control projects and health care needs.
"I favor some flexibility on the issues that we deal with in this county," Ellis said. "I think in the midst of the worst health challenge in 100 years and probably the worst economic challenges since the Great Depression, we can’t solve all our problems, but I think we should not handcuff ourselves."
Meanwhile, Garcia called on commissioners to begin the process of determining what infrastructure needs exist within the county to determine how the money should be allocated.
The motion was opposed by the two Republican members of the court, Precinct 3 Commissioner Steve Radack and Precinct 4 Commissioner Jack Cagle. Cagle said he did not see a need to rush the decision on what officials believe is the largest financial transaction in the history of the county, instead calling for a second opinion and for more public input.
Leaders with both the Cy-Fair Houston Chamber of Commerce and the Greater Tomball Area Chamber of Commerce were among those who submitted requests to commissioners calling on them to refrain from diverting any funding away from infrastructure, including road and transportation projects.
"We are the fastest growing precincts in Harris County and to take this money away from our infrastructure will not only crumble our streets but will hurt our businesses and communities," Cy-Fair Chamber President Leslie Martone said, referring to precincts 3 and 4.
Radack said the move lacked transparency. He argued that money collected from toll road drivers should not be used to fund projects that otherwise would have to be funded by an increase in property taxes.
"There is nothing transparent about this," Radack said. "This is a money grab, and it is a way to try to basically, as far as I'm concerned ... use money to pay for things that are normally paid for by ad valorem [property] taxes."
Garcia said he was sensitive to concerns about transparency. He said keeping the conversations within commissioners court would demonstrate a commitment to transparency as funds are allocated.
"This is not a workaround, but rather this is just working to give the public more for what they have already given us other than just holding it all in a safe deposit box without it working for the public," Garcia said.
The toll road authority brought in just over $900 million in revenue in the fiscal year that ended Feb. 29, according to budget documents, meaning the $300 million one-time payment constitutes around one-third of the annual revenue. Berry said he expects the annual $90 million franchise fee to make up about 10% of annual revenue during an average year.