Jersey Village to reinstall 11 red-light cameras as state leaders consider ban


Red-light cameras are coming back to Jersey Village.

The Jersey Village City Council unanimously voted at a Nov. 19 meeting to proceed with the reinstallation of red-light cameras at 11 locations along Hwy. 290. The cameras were installed between 2008 and 2011, but were removed in 2013 at the direction of the Texas Department of Transportation to facilitate work on a Hwy. 290 widening project.

The council’s vote took place after the city hired the engineering firm REDS LLC in August to evaluate the usefulness and placement of the cameras, Jersey Village Police Chief Eric Foerster said.

“We re-engineered all of the intersections,” Foerster said at the November meeting. “The sight lines have changed; the road surface has changed. At each and every intersection, [the engineers]came back and said it would be a benefit to have red-light cameras.”

The move is taking place at a time when the constitutionality of red-light cameras is being questioned by statewide officials and challenged in the Texas Supreme Court. In September, Gov. Greg Abbott called on state lawmakers to pass legislation in the 2019 Legislative Session—which kicks off in January—that would ban cities from operating red-light cameras.

“They are expensive, studies indicate that they may increase accidents where deployed, and they pose constitutional issues,” Abbott wrote.

Jersey Village overview

A red-light camera is a device that takes an image of a vehicle as it enters an intersection during red lights. Those images are then reviewed by law enforcement officers, who determine if a driver illegally ran the red light and issue fines through the mail as necessary.

The 11 cameras in Jersey Village will be reinstalled across five Hwy. 290 intersections—Jones Road, West Road, Senate Avenue, FM 529 and Beltway 8—facing various directions. In addition to replacing the cameras, the engineering study also recommended several additional methods for reducing accidents, including extending the length of yellow lights and trimming trees to make traffic signals more visible, Foerster said.

“It all works together,” he said.

Foerster said data collected by TxDOT and the Jersey Village Police Department found a steady decrease in accidents from 2010 to 2013 at the intersections where the red-light cameras were installed. When the cameras were removed in 2013, the trend started to turn around, he said.

Total red-light related crashes at the relevant intersections reached a low point in 2012, when 26 crashes were recorded. That number jumped to a high point of 104 crashes in 2015. However, red-light related crashes fell back down to 31 in 2017, even though the cameras were still not being used.

Jersey Village City Manager Austin Bleess said the city should not have to spend any money on the camera installation. The cameras are expected to be reinstalled and operational within the next six to 10 months, he said.

Legal questions

State Sen. Bob Hall, R-Edgewood, filed Senate Bill 77 on Nov. 12, which would ban red-light cameras throughout the state. Attempts were also made to ban red-light cameras during 2015 and 2017 sessions, but in both years bills that passed out of the Senate failed to pass through the House of Representatives.

Foerster testified at a previous state committee hearing where a red-light camera ban bill was being discussed along with the city’s former manager Mike Castro. Bleess said he was not sure if any city officials would testify next year.

This year, the Texas Supreme Court is also hearing a case that could decide the fate of red-light cameras in the state. In oral arguments presented Nov. 1, attorney Russell Bowman made several arguments against the existing red-light camera law—adopted in 2007—including that it violates the constitution’s guarantee of due process. A decision from the Supreme Court is expected to be made in June.

Jersey Village resident John Baucum spoke against the reinstallation of the red-light cameras at the November meeting, citing the ongoing efforts to have them banned statewide.

“I would advise you not to put the cameras up if the governor is about to pass a law that will pull them right back down,” he said.

Rod Erskine, a former Jersey Village mayor, spoke in favor of the cameras at the meeting. Erskine led an effort against a 2016 ballot proposition in Jersey Village that would have banned use of the cameras within the city. Sixty-five percent of voters rejected the ban, allowing the city the option to reinstall the cameras at a later date if council members wanted to do so.

“While data from other cities may show different facts, the data from our police department actually shows the red-light cameras did reduce the number of traffic incidents as far as car crashes as well as injuries resulting from those crashes,” Erskine said at the meeting. “We are surrounded by three very busy streets with a lot of traffic that doesn’t live in Jersey Village. You can sit out there and see people run those red lights yourself.”

Bleess cited the 2016 election results and the recommendation from the city’s police department as reasons for moving forward with the reinstallation.

“This is certainly a positive and appreciated thing in Jersey Village,” Bleess said.

The following graph shows red-light related and non-red-light related crashes at the five intersections in Jersey Village for 2010 through 2017. All cameras were removed in 2013.

Share this story
  1. As the graph clearly shows, it’s easier to correlate the accident rate with the construction project rather than the removal of the cameras. As construction wound down, so did the accident rate. It’s all about the money.

  2. WOW nothing but Highway Robbery. Outlaw everyone of the cameras or make the Cities donate the all the money collected to charity. I guarantee you the cities would slam the door to all the red light companies. Gov Abott is right on this one.
    Retired POPO
    36 years

  3. Unconstitutional. The driver is not cited but the registered owner. I got one of these in 2013. People were lined up out the door. This is a money scheme. The ticket i got was proceeding through the lane while yellow i won my argument because i had been rear end twice because of this. It does nor reduce accidents it increases them. While i was there the officers almost arrested domrone who was upset about the process. I spoke to a man whos son had the onfraction but because the car was registered to him he got the ricket. You have a right to meet your accused. Little secret about this. It is a civil crime not criminal do if you refuse to pay its trated as a collection item. Scam

Leave A Reply

Shawn Arrajj
Shawn Arrajj serves as the editor of the Cy-Fair edition of Community Impact Newspaper where he covers the Cy-Fair and Jersey Village communities. He mainly writes about development, transportation and issues in Harris County.
Back to top