Lewisville mayor says he is being ‘forced out’ of office due to controversial amendment added to SB 2


Updated at 12:22 p.m. This story was updated to clarify the language in the amendment and includes the city’s plans for a special election in May 2020 to fill the remainder of the mayor’s term once he steps down.

Lewisville Mayor Rudy Durham says an amendment to Senate Bill 2 will force him to abandon his 25-year post as an elected official at the end of the year.

The amendment—originally filed as Senate Bill 1146 by Sens. Pat Fallon, R-Prosper, and Paul Bettencourt, R-Houston—prohibits elected officials from being employed by an appraisal district. Durham works full-time as the chief appraiser for the Denton Central Appraisal District.

Durham believes he was targeted by the legislation, which was tacked on as an amendment to SB 2—the bill that capped property tax revenues and was signed into law by the governor June 12.

Still, when choosing between his job and his elective office, Durham said the decision was simple.

“I am not a fool,” Durham said. “I make my living as the chief appraiser. [For serving as mayor of] the city of Lewisville, I get $50 a meeting, so it’s an easy answer.”

Durham’s three-year term as mayor is not up until May 2021.

Fallon’s original bill was left pending in committee in the legislative session that ended in May. But it got a second life as part of the property tax reform package that many lawmakers deemed to be this year’s top priority along with school finance reform.

According to a statement of intent filed with Fallon’s original bill, his proposal was meant to eliminate the conflict created when an employee responsible for determining property values also controls property tax rates.

“S.B. 1146 is simple and straightforward,” according to the statement of intent. “It stops a glaring conflict of interest.”

Fallon did not respond to Community Impact Newspaper‘s request for comment.

In March, Lewisville City Council passed a resolution in opposition to SB1146 on the basis that “the chief appraiser has no control over taxable appraised values of property.”

A staff memo also said that Durham has no “personal control” over the city’s property tax rate. “In fact, Mayor Durham has never cast a vote as mayor on the city’s property tax rate,” the memo stated.

Durham said he is “unaware” of any plans by the city of Lewisville to fight the legislation in court.

“Basically I’ve resigned my position,” said Durham, who added that he plans to step down Dec. 31.

City of Lewisville spokesman James Kunke said by email that a special election will be held at the same time as the May 2020 election to fill the remainder of Durham’s term. The mayor’s position will remain vacant until then.

The bill initially applied only to counties with more than 20,000 residents. It had proposed banning elected or appointed officials from also being employed as the chief appraiser or assessor. The amendment that became law bans any employee of the appraisal district from also being an officer or employee of a taxing unit, such as a city. 

Durham said his dual role “is not a problem, and it hasn’t been a problem.”

Durham was first elected to City Council in 1994. In 2015, he became mayor. He was elected to a second term as mayor in 2018. His fellow council members contend that the law “denies Lewisville voters the right to select a mayor of their choosing.”

“Either you agree that this is some sort of issue, which it isn’t, in my opinion, and you make it so that nobody can do this, or you carve it out halfway, so I don’t understand Austin’s point here except to take away local control,” City Council member TJ Gilmore said at a March 18 council meeting about the original proposed legislation.

Chris Wallace is president and CEO of the North Texas Commission, which advocates for legislation that promotes prosperity of the region. He said that while this amendment is a “head-scratcher,” it is not unlike other bills passed during this legislation session, which he described as “anti-local control.”

“What’s the point [of this bill]?” he said. “We want as many people who are qualified to run for elective office.”

Share this story
  1. Craig D. Hargrove, M.B.A.

    Biased journalism is bad journalism, uninformed journalism is just inexcusable. When researching what appears to be the article is the “over reach of Austin” perhaps research should begin with educating yourself to the reasons for the change. Read the Texas State Statutes section 23. which caps homestead, presents the age of comparables, and accepts foreclosure sales as comps. Do your research go to any county in Texas by using, NetROnline.com and pull the county you are seeking. Take sample properties and realize many sales prices are blocked, which means that consumers do not have full access when they attempt to protest taxes.. Read HUD guidelines that allow not only escrow for taxes and insurance, but a cushion of 1/6 beyond the actual insurance and taxes. This means people are seeing dramatic increases in mortgage payments the largest bill in almost all households. Now put this all together, with the way Mr. Durham is running the department, declared homesteads in Denton county will go up each and every year 10%, does everyone’s salary go up 10% every year? Even during the mortgage crisis the properties in Denton county were accelerating in value. Further Mr. Durham has instructed his staff to only use the last year of comps, the Texas State Statutes clearly states 24 months. The final piece who does he report to, not the county elected officers, not the State Comptroller, he reports to Taxing authorities, call them ask them a question about taxes and appraisals and they will refer you to Mr. Durhams group, so there is no direct access to the tax payers. If you have the courage to do the research you will determine the facts your reported are far different from the actual facts. Craig D. Hargrove, M.B.A. 972 395 0635

    • Craig,

      GREAT information. I’ve never agreed that we, as homeowners, should just automatically accept that we should pay more in taxes EVERY year and receive zero benefits. If my neighbor makes a killing on the sale of his house, good for him. But why should that affect me in an adverse way when I’m NOT selling? Thank you for your tips.

Leave A Reply

Olivia Lueckemeyer
Olivia Lueckemeyer graduated in 2013 from Loyola University New Orleans with a degree in journalism. She joined Community Impact Newspaper in October 2016 as reporter for the Southwest Austin edition before her promotion to editor in March 2017. In July 2018 she returned home to the Dallas area and became editor of the Richardson edition.
Back to top