Suspecting deliberations on potential Tesla deal, Travis County union representatives weigh in on use of economic development incentives

A photo for the main Travis County building's sign
Electric automaker Tesla has reportedly narrowed down its options for a new auto plant to Austin and Tulsa, Oklahoma. (Community Impact Newspaper Staff)

Electric automaker Tesla has reportedly narrowed down its options for a new auto plant to Austin and Tulsa, Oklahoma. (Community Impact Newspaper Staff)

An auto union representative and others weighed in June 16 about the possibility of Palo Alto-based electric automaker Tesla building its next plant in Travis County, where commissioners may be considering economic incentives to finalize terms for a deal with the company.

An item taken in executive session on the Travis County Commissioners Court’s June 16 agenda pertained to Travis County Code Chapter 28, which covers the use of economic development incentives used to “stimulate business and commercial activity” in the county.

Until recently, Travis County was in a self-imposed moratorium on the use of Chapter 28 economic development incentives. An item regarding Chapter 28 first appeared on the Commissioners Court agenda May 26, and, after a discussion in executive session, commissioners voted to “unpause” the use of such incentives. However, the lifted moratorium was to be lifted for only up to two months, to be used on a single, unidentified “special project.”

According to the United Auto Workers—an automobile workers’ union—that “special project” is electric carmaker Tesla’s next assembly plant. UAW communications representative Brian Rothenburg told Community Impact Newspaper on June 16 that “it is [UAW’s] understanding that Item 21 was about Tesla.”

Tesla CEO Elon Musk has also confirmed in the past that the company’s new plant will be constructed in either Austin or Tulsa, Oklahoma. The “gigafactory,” as Tesla calls its plants, may be its largest facility yet, according to comments made by Tesla CFO Zachary Kirkhorn during a quarterly earnings report April 30, and could supply thousands of jobs.


However, Travis County representatives have not confirmed that Tesla is the subject of the county’s current economic incentives discussion. Hector Nieto, Travis County public information officer, declined to comment on the item, citing attorney-client privilege exceptions to the Texas Open Meetings Act for the item in question.

Still, several members of the public, including a representative from UAW, called into court June 16 to weigh in on the county’s use of economic incentives for large corporations and called for more transparency into related proceedings. Tesla, while alluded to, was not explicitly named.

“Certainly, the UAW has a record of being interested in maintaining auto jobs and other kinds of jobs that are good for the middle class,” said Manuel Quinto-Pozos, a local attorney for UAW.

Quinto-Pozos cautioned commissioners to consider the importance of safeguards for workers who would be employed by a corporation that benefits from Chapter 28 incentives.

“I would ask that you please not rush in your judgment and your work on this, especially in the middle of this pandemic,” he said. “I’m concerned about what has happened in other situations where a company has received incentives and made certain promises that are not fulfilled.”

Carol Guthrie, business manager for the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 1624, a union representing Austin and Travis County government employees, called in to express frustration that county resources would be used to aid a wealthy company.

“To consider now that perhaps they need incentives in order to come to Travis County is absolutely shameful, especially when your own employees aren’t getting a pay raise because we were told the funds just weren’t there,” Guthrie said. “If someone wants to come to our wonderful town here, to Austin and Travis County, and they are a billionaire, I would certainly hope they could foot their own bill.”

Other workers union representatives also called in to express perspectives similar to UAW’s, including Jessica Wolf, deputy policy director for the Workers Defense Project.

“If a company is coming here and creating jobs, we want to ensure those are good, safe jobs,” Wolf said.

No vote or motion was taken up regarding agenda Item 21 following the commissioners’ executive session discussion, but Travis County Judge Sam Biscoe confirmed that the discussion would be taken up again at next week’s meeting June 23.
By Olivia Aldridge
Olivia is the reporter for Community Impact's Central Austin edition. A graduate of Presbyterian College in upstate South Carolina, Olivia was a reporter and producer at South Carolina Public Radio before joining Community Impact in Austin.


MOST RECENT

The Austin City Council is set to meet May 6 to go over a 70-item agenda. (Ben Thompson/Community Impact Newspaper)
Austin City Hall notebook: Votes on revamped APD cadet academy, possible shift in homeless strategy on tap May 6

Council may look to the possibility of establishing designated campgrounds for the Austin's homeless this spring, with a citywide public camping ban set to go into effect May 11.

Heidi Sloan will assume the position of head of school on July 1. (Courtesy St. Michael's Catholic Academy)
St. Michael’s Catholic Academy announces new head of school

As director of academics, Sloan spearheaded the school’s Winter Term program—a global travel internship program currently in its sixth year.

building
WellMed clears next hurdle, gaining permit for proposed South Austin clinic and senior center

Sunset Valley will still have to approve a future building permit for the project later this year.

Austin City Council will vote on whether to reboot the police department's training academy May 6. (Courtesy Austin Police Department)
Benchmarks for 'reimagined' APD cadet academy on track ahead of City Council commencement vote

Training of the Austin Police Department's 144th cadet class could get underway next month following an overhaul of the academy's instructional process and curriculum.

Photo of a gloved hand holding a vaccine vial with the words "vaccine news" superimposed
Austin-area health officials prep for vaccines to open to kids 12 and up

Austin-Travis County interim Health Authority Mark Escott said he expects the FDA to authorize Pfizer's vaccine for kids 12 and up within a week.

The ACC Pinnacle campus has been closed since the spring of 2018 due to required maintenance of the out-dated facility. (Nicholas Cicale/Community Impact Newspaper)
Austin Community College to negotiate lease of Pinnacle campus, prohibiting concrete batch plant use

Trustees revised a previous action to negotiate a lease agreement with the contractors of the Oak Hill Parkway project in Southwest Austin.

New penalties for camping and several other activities will be enforced after the May 1 election is certified and Proposition B's homeless ordinances are in effect. (Ben Thompson/Community Impact Newspaper)
With Proposition B's passage, Austin City Council looks to solidify homelessness summit goals, may consider designated campgrounds

The city may look to the concept of temporary designated campsites to house individuals experiencing homelessness after a new camping ban enacted through Proposition B goes into effect.

Photo of hands in purple gloves prepared a vaccine vial
As Travis County receives fewer vaccines this week, state asks for 'one more big push' in distribution

The Texas Department of State Health Services is shifting its distribution model for vaccines moving forward.

Voters line up at the Carver branch of the Austin Public Library on May 1. (Olivia Aldridge/Community Impact Newspaper)
Austin May 1 election: See the results from all eight propositions

Nearly 60% of city voters supported Proposition B, which will reinstate criminal penalties for camping, solicitation and sitting or lying down in certain public areas.

Dripping Springs residents could vote in two City Council races May 1. (Nicholas Cicale/Community Impact Newspaper)
Dripping Springs election: Final voting results are in for City Council, DSISD races

The Dripping Springs area has elected three new officials to public office, while two additional incumbents will hold onto their positions.

Voters stand in the rain at the Shops at Arbor Walk on election day, May 1. (Olivia Aldridge/Community Impact Newspaper)
Austin residents vote down strong mayor

Unnofficial results show that a proposition to institute a strong mayor form of government in Austin failed by a significant margin.