Trustees voted 6-1 to select two architectural firms to design the security upgrades. Scheduled to be completed in summer 2020, the enhancements will mark the final step in a seven-year endeavor by LISD to make all its 43 schools substantially safer, according to LISD officials.
Fields and Associates Architects, which has an office in West Lake Hills, was awarded design contracts for six middle schools: Canyon Ridge, Four Points, Henry, Running Brushy, Stiles and Wiley.
Pfluger Architects, which has offices in Austin, Houston and San Antonio, received contracts for three high school and one alternative school: Glenn, Rouse, New Hope and Leander Extended Opportunity.
Both firms will draw up designs, which will be followed by cost estimates, according to LISD. All security enhancements at the 10 schools will be funded through the $454.4 million school bond passed in 2017.
Planned enhancements include secure entry vestibules and other measures, depending on the age and the type of school, according to LISD.
Security upgrades were completed last summer at Cedar Park High School, Cedar Park Middle School, Leander High School, Leander Middle School, Vandegrift High School and Vista Ridge High School. Each project was designed by one of four architectural firms.
Each firm's work was graded by LISD on an “evaluation matrix” to measure their performance on the six schools, according to LISD documents. The two firms selected Thursday night received the highest assessments.
The final substantial security upgrades to be built in the summer of 2020 will bring every LISD school up to a roughly similar standard of security, according to LISD spokesperson Corey Ryan.
Plans for substantial security upgrades in LISD, with an emphasis on the elementary school level, began in earnest after the Sandy Hook school shooting in 2012, said Jimmy Disler, LISD chief facilities and operations officer, in an August interview.
After Sandy Hook, money from the $559 million school bond passed in 2007 was diverted to improve security, Disler said.
Before the trustees' vote, Disler attempted to clarify some confusion over the grading system. Trustee Jim MacKay voted against the firm selections without comment. During a meeting intermission, he said he voted against the measure because he felt the grading system was not done in a fair manner.