Letter from River Place Limited District to Texas Parks & Wildlife Department defends trail fee

5

It was only after several months of deliberation from the board of directors coupled with ample public outreach as well as a comparison to charges levied at another Austin-area park that the River Place Limited District Board of Directors decided to charge its own trail fee to nonresidents.

That is the main substance of an Aug. 6 letter acquired by Community Impact Newspaper from the law firm McGinnis Lochridge on behalf of the River Place Limited District.

The letter, confirmed authentic by River Place board President Scott Crosby, is a response to a July 23 letter from the Texas Parks & Wildlife Department stating the $10 per person and per pet fee the River Place Limited District has been charging nonmembers to use the trail at designated times since March is not reasonable, nor is it comparable with other state or local public facilities.

A $500,000 grant issued in 2001 by the TPWD for the partial acquisition and full development of Woodlands Park was the main reason for the department’s investigation into the legality of the fee being charged by the limited district.

The response letter from McGinnis Lochridge details capital expenditures pertaining to the limited district’s Woodlands Park nature trail, including $250,000 for its Phase 2 portion.

The expenditures “show that the District incurs significant ongoing expenses to maintain it,” the letter states. “While many visitors are generous enough to leave donations, they simply are not sufficient to cover the associated maintenance expenses.”

Though the River Place board has repeatedly said the fee would go toward maintenance of the trail, it has also disclosed in public meetings that the cost to implement the fee has essentially resulted in the board breaking even on the endeavor.

Another argument brought forth by McGinnis Lochridge centers on comparable pricing from another public park in the Austin area—Emma Long Metropolitan Park in West Austin.

“For reference, the City of Austin’s Emma Long Park, which is the closest public park in proximity to the District, charges $10 per day, Friday through Saturday and holidays; $5 per day, Monday through Thursday; and $1 to walk in or bike in,” the letter states. “In other words, the City of Austin charges an access fee at all times for Emma Long Park. Meanwhile, the District provides free access to the Nature Trail the vast majority of the time, charging $10 only during peak hours of usage on weekends and holidays.”

Budget numbers accompanying the letter show that from the end of January through June 30, the limited district has collected $35,580 in trail fees. Other expenditures show $46,101.13 in monthly landscape maintenance from January 2017 to June 2019 and $5,395.51 in water bills from Jan. 31, 2017, to June 30, 2019.

Under the trail fee expenditures section of the accompanying budget, the costs amount to $43,030.15 from Jan. 31, 2019, to June 30, 2019. Though the costs to implement the trail fee through the end of June show a net loss from the program through its first several months of almost $8,000, Crosby said startup fees contributed to that deficit.

“I think when it got down to it, what we had communicated was that we had made about $35,600 [through the end of June], and that we had spent about $35,000 since the beginning of the program [to implement the fee],” Crosby said, adding that estimated profits from the fee in July amount to around $2,000—money the board put back into the limited district’s general fund.

August profits from the trail fee will be made known at the Sept. 24 limited district board meeting, he said.

There is still not a set time frame for when members of the River Place Limited District and TPWD might meet because key members of the parks department will be out of town, Crosby said, but added it could be scheduled in the next few weeks.

Community Impact Newspaper has reached out to TPWD for more information.

Share this story
5 comments
COMMENT
  1. “Peak hours” -hah. Laughable. We used to go on this trail all the time Saturday and Sunday. I would never consider it busy in any way that affected the atmosphere. At most 10 cars were parked legally near the entrance. We came once post fee implementation and the condition of the trail is almost identical in level of maintenance, as it was before the fee.

    This fee is obviously to keep people outside of that community away. This whole thing is a mess.

    • For real, if they are going to use Emma Long as an example, then they should be charging $1 per person to walk in to the trail.

  2. It’s simple. If Ripoff … I mean River Place wants to charge $10 a head, they can refund the taxpayers’ money they got from the state.

    Simple.

  3. There is a very easy way for non-residents to avoid the $10 fee. Don’t use the River Place trails.

    One way the district could lower the operating costs of implementing the fee system would be to migrate to a an online reservation system where trail users could pay online, reserve a date and time to use the trail in advance, print the receipt and carry it with them while on the trail. As long as the number of pre-paid reservations is generally in line with the non-resident usage, staff would not need to be deployed.

Leave A Reply

Brian Rash
Brian has been a reporter and editor since 2012. He wrote about the music scene in Dallas-Fort Worth before becoming managing editor for the Graham Leader in Graham, Texas, in 2013. He relocated to Austin, Texas, in 2015 to work for Gatehouse Media's large design hub. He became the editor for the Lake Travis-Westlake publication of Community Impact in August 2018.
Back to top