Austin City Council agreed to lessen restrictions on accessory dwelling units, or ADUs, during its Nov. 19 meeting after about three hours of debate.

ADU units have also been called two-family residential units, secondary apartments, granny flats and garage apartments.

Changes approved by council allow ADUs to be located 10 feet from each property’s main home instead of 15 feet as currently required by city law. Also, the minimum lot size required to build an ADU has been reduced from 7,000 square feet to 5,740 square feet, and the structure cannot be larger than 1,100 square feet.

Protections were also passed to prevent ADUs from being used as Type 2 non-owner occupied short-term rentals, or STRs.  New law also prevents secondary units from being rented as STRs more than 30 days per year. 

Driveways are no longer required to build a secondary unit, and as long as the property is located less than or equal to .25 miles from an activity corridor with bus or transit routes then no parking spot is  required. Only units farther than one-quarter of a mile away from those corridors would be required to have one parking spot. Front-yard parking would no longer be banned.

The ordinance applies citywide, with the exception of areas zoned single-family standard lot, or SF-2, and single-family large lot, or SF-1.

Proponents of the changes said ADUs could be used as a tool to tackle Austin’s affordability crisis, and opponents expressed concern about preserving neighborhood character and allowing code changes that may override some neighborhood plans.

“For progressives, that’s a really big sell for allowing accessory dwelling units that you can have different people of different economic means getting to enjoy our greatest neighborhoods,” said District 4 Council Member Greg Casar, who helped lead efforts to enact the changes.

District 3 Council Member Pio Renteria said his community fought against pushback from Austin Neighborhood Council to develop ADUs in his area. New secondary units helped create new income for struggling families, kept others in their homes and created a diverse community of varying income levels and ethnicities, Renteria said.

Some council members voiced concern the changes should wait until the city’s land development code is revamped during the CodeNEXT process, otherwise unintended consequences could come from the changes, which cause more community issues.

”Once this genie is out of the bottle, we can’t fix it,” District 1 Council Member Ora Houston said. She voted against the approved changes, as did Mayor Pro Tem Kathie Tovo of District 9 and Council Members Ann Kitchen of District 5 and Leslie Pool of District 7.

Responding to concerns that the majority of neighborhoods may not want ADUs, District 2 Council Member Delia Garza said if a majority of homeowners do not want ADUs then they will not likely develop one on their lot.

Casar said the approved changes can also serve the neighborhood interest of property rights.

“For folks that are interested in property rights … the idea that you are allowed to build an extension to your house, but you aren’t allowed to put a door on it and kitchen in it seems very confusing. So I think … regardless of whether you’re a progressive or someone who’s more focused on property rights, this is a common-sense move.”

Advertisement

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
 
COMMUNITY CONVERSATION

Austin City Council lessens restrictions on accessory dwelling units

Comments

  • ADU's do not result in affordable housing. Even Casar acknowledged that in quoting the realtor's ABoR survey showing that the lowest priced ADU's rents in Austin are $1,100/month, that is not affordable. The building costs are too expensive for ADU's for them to be affordable to rent out except to family members where recovering cost is not a consideration. Expanding the ADU's into SF-3 neighborhoods was for the investor class and realtors. Casar serves his ABoR masters well. Don't be fooled renters, and remember in November, what your actual situation is, it will not improve from this. Remember in November who grandstanded and laid out a long line of bull.


  • […] in many high-rent cities, like Austin, have fought for this kind of legislation. It not only helps alleviate the housing crunch, it also […]


  • […] Yeah, a grandfathered granny flat. In 2015 there was a big debate in the Austin city council about granny flats. The urbanist forums I follow were like, “Please come to city council and […]


  • […] City Council members recently relaxed rules on accessory dwelling units, making it easier for homeowners to add a small home in their backyard […]


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Commenting Policy: Community Impact Newspaper welcomes observations and opinions. Comments and discussions should be relevant to the news topics we cover and contain no abusive language. Comments that are libelous, off topic, advertorial, spam, vulgar, profane or include personal or professional attacks will not be allowed. Users who do not follow the stated guidelines will be warned once, and repeat offenders will be banned permanently. Comments made by website users do not represent the opinions of Community Impact Newspaper and have not been checked for accuracy. Community Impact Newspaper reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter’s name or username and location, in any medium. See also Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.