Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst has advocated holding out money to pay into the system in anticipation of having to spend more money on schools in light of a supreme court decision. But he and other leaders have deferred action on either overhauling the school finance system or restoring any funding until after the Texas Supreme Court makes its ruling—an idea that doesn't sit well with some lawmakers who fought the cuts last session.
"I think all the talk about deferring to after the session, until the [Texas] Supreme Court rules, may have merit on the question of how we distribute the money among the districts, but I don't think that it has merit with regard to the very important decision of how much money the system requires," said Rep. Mark Strama, D-District 50. "I don't think we need a court to tell us that the system is not producing the results we demand from it."
The Texas branch of the American Federation of Teachers also urged lawmakers to act and not wait for a ruling, which could come next year.
"Today's ruling should spur the Legislature to do what it ought to be doing anyway—using the state's resurgent revenue to restore school funding that was cut severely last session and reforming the school finance system to satisfy constitutional requirements," Texas AFT President Linda Bridges said. "The inevitable appeal that the state's lawyers will pursue in this case must not become an excuse for legislative inertia. The state needs to invest more in public education immediately because the kids can't wait."