Prior to recusing herself from the meeting, Jones issued a second public apology to Kaur regarding her actions, stating that her passion for enforcing public safety got the better of her. As part of her statement, Jones agreed to step aside from the Governance Committee for three months, effective immediately. She also said she would participate in leadership training.
“As the mayor, the chief elected officer of the city, I take seriously our responsibility to keep our community safe. That is, in fact, our No. 1 responsibility,” Jones said. “As a member of the LGBTQ+ community, we have seen too many tragedies at LGBTQ+ establishments, and I could not [and] would not unnecessarily place the lives of patrons, employees and potentially our firefighters in harm’s way. I became passionate that morning because I firmly believe public safety is our No. 1 responsibility. I should not have raised my voice at my colleague, and I apologize for doing so.”
In their own wordsSpears said that though she originally supported the censure, after the investigation, she did not believe Jones’ conduct warranted further action. She also expressed concerns over the investigation, its lack of transparency and the precedent censuring Jones could set.
“After examining the findings, it is clear the conduct was unprofessional, and I have genuine compassion for how my colleague felt in that moment, and that should not be minimized,” Spears said. “However, the level of unprofessionalism found does not rise to the level of censure nor removal from the governance committee. The conduct was inappropriate, but it was not unlawful.”