UPDATED: Here is how Texas voters weighed in on 10 state constitutional amendments on the ballot Nov. 5

Texas capitol
Texas voters voted for or against 10 amendments to the state’s constitution Nov. 5. (Community Impact Newspaper staff)

Texas voters voted for or against 10 amendments to the state’s constitution Nov. 5. (Community Impact Newspaper staff)

Updated 7:30 a.m. Nov. 6

With 99% of counties reporting statewide, all but one of the Texas state constitutional amendments appear to have won voter approval in the Nov. 5 election. Only Proposition No. 1, which would allow a person to hold more than one office as municipal judge at the same time, has failed by a considerable margin. Proposition No. 9, which would exempt precious metals from ad valorem taxation if held in a precious metal repository, appears to have won by a narrow margin of about 3%. Proposition No. 10, which would allow the transfer of a law enforcement animal to a qualified caretaker in certain circumstances, passed by the largest margin.

Here are the unofficial totals as of the morning of Nov. 6. All results are unofficial until canvassed.

With 99% of counties reporting statewide, the following results are in on the Texas state constitutional amendments:

Proposition No. 1:


A total of 615,774, or 35.06% voted for, and 1,140,466, or 64.94%, voted against the proposition.

Proposition No. 2:

A total of 1,135,825 or 65.05% voted for, and 510,170, or 34.95%, voted against the proposition.

Proposition No. 3:

A total of 1,483,378, or 84.93% voted for, and 263,302, or 15.07%, voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 4:

A total of 1,318,373, or 74.96% voted for, and 440,341, or 25.04%, voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 5:

A total of 1,545,482, or 88.01% voted for, and 210,615, or 11.99%, voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 6:

A total of 1,104,303, or 63.39% voted for, and 637,735, or 36.61%, voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 7:

A total of 1,282,818, or 73.55% voted for, and 461,314, or 26.45%, voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 8:

A total of 1,343,689, or 76.84%, voted for, and 404,973, or 23.16%, voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 9:

A total of 874,369, or 51.71% voted for, and 816,511, or 48.29%, voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 10

A total of 1,650,834, or 94.04% voted for, and 104,717, or 5.96%, voted against the measure.

Updated 11:30 p.m.

With 97% of counties reporting statewide, the following results are in on the Texas state constitutional amendments:

Proposition No. 1:

A total of 535,853, or 34.63% voted for, and 1,011,319, or 65.37%, voted against the proposition.

Proposition No. 2:

A total of 989,764 or 64.38% voted for, and 547,520, or 35.62%, voted against the proposition.

Proposition No. 3:

A total of 1,313,866, or 85.4% voted for, and 224,541, or 14.6%, voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 4:

A total of 1,179,220, or 76.13% voted for, and 369,775, or 23.87%, voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 5:

A total of 1,361,142, or 88.01% voted for, and 185,424, or 11.99%, voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 6:

A total of 967,786, or 63.08% voted for, and 566,496, or 36.92%, voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 7:

A total of 1,123,861, or 73.19% voted for, and 411,778, or 26.81%, voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 8:

A total of 1,177,742, or 76.5%, voted for, and 361,843, or 23.5%, voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 9:

A total of 789,306, or 52.47% voted for, and 715,110, or 47.53%, voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 10

A total of 1,460,225, or 94.03% voted for, and 92,777, or 5.97%, voted against the measure.

Updated 10:17 p.m.

With 93% of counties reporting, the following results are in on the Texas state constitutional amendments:

Proposition No. 1:

A total of 414,985, or 33.93% voted for, and 808,051, or 66.07%, voted against the proposition.

Proposition No. 2:

A total of 773,655, or 63.74% voted for, and 440,185, or 26.36% voted against the proposition.

Proposition No. 3:

A total of 1,043,858, or 85.86% voted for, and 171,945, or 14.14% voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 4:

A total of 946,096, or 77.34% voted for, and 277,145, or 22.55% voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 5:

A total of 1,074,087, or 87.95% voted for, and 147,126, or 12.05% voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 6:

A total of 778,062, or 63.21% voted for, and 452,801, or 36.79% voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 7:

A total of 896,501, or 72.79% voted for, and 335,077, or 27.21%, voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 8:

A total of 941,954, or 76.27%, voted for, and 293,074, or 23.73%, voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 9:

A total of 644,268, or 53.7% voted for, and 555,466, or 46.3% voted against the measure.

Proposition No. 10

A total of 1,162,491, or 93.81% voted for, and 76,721, or 6.19%, voted against the measure.

Posted 8:10 p.m.

Texas voters weighed in on 10 constitutional amendments in the Nov. 5 election. Here is the ballot language for each amendment and how many votes each received for or against the measure. All votes are unofficial until canvassed.

As of 7:49 p.m. with 81 of 254 counties, or 31% of the total vote:



Proposition No. 1

“The constitutional amendment permitting a person to hold more than one office as a municipal judge at the same time.”

A total of 169,582, or 34.33%, voted yes and 314,444, or 65.67%, voted no.



Proposition No. 2

“The constitutional amendment providing for the issuance of additional general obligation bonds by the Texas Water Development Board in an amount not to exceed $200 million to provide financial assistance for the development of certain projects in economically distressed areas.”

A total of 322,795, or 65.69%, voted yes and 168,623, or 34.31%, voted no



Proposition No. 3

“The constitutional amendment authorizing the Legislature to provide for a temporary exemption from ad valorem taxation for a portion of the appraised value of certain property damaged by a disaster.”

A total of 425,140, or 86.5%, voted yes, and 66,323, or 13.5%, voted no.

Proposition No. 4

“The constitutional amendment prohibiting the imposition of an individual income tax, including a tax on an individual’s share of partnership and unincorporated association income.”

A total of 357,103, or 72.54%, voted yes, and 135,180, or 27.46%, voted no.



Proposition No. 5

“The constitutional amendment dedicating the revenue received from the existing state sales and use taxes that are imposed on sporting goods to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and the Texas Historical Commission to protect Texas’ natural areas, water quality, and history by acquiring, managing and improving state and local parks and historic sites while not increasing the rate of the state sales and use taxes.”

A total of 423,038, or 85.94%, voted yes, and 69,232, or 14.06%, voted no.



Proposition No. 6

“The constitutional amendment authorizing the Legislature to increase by $3 billion the maximum bond amount authorized for the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas.”

A total of 323,835, or 66.09%, voted yes, and 166,185, or 33.91%, voted no.



Proposition No. 7

“The constitutional amendment allowing increased distributions to the available school fund.”

A total of 364,350, or 74.35%, voted yes, and 125,692, or 25.65%, voted no.



Proposition No. 8

“The constitutional amendment providing for the creation of the flood infrastructure fund to assist in the financing of drainage, flood mitigation and flood control projects.”

A total of 387,900, or 78.82%, voted yes, and 104,235, or 21.18%, voted no.



Proposition No. 9

“The constitutional amendment authorizing the Legislature to exempt from ad valorem taxation precious metal held in a precious metal depository located in this state.”

A total of 256,468, or 53.69%, voted yes, and 221,182, or 46.31%, voted no.



Proposition No. 10

“The constitutional amendment to allow the transfer of a law enforcement animal to a qualified caretaker in certain circumstances.”

A total of 461,503, or 93.34%, voted yes, and 32,919, or 6.66%, voted no.

SHARE THIS STORY
By Vanessa Holt

A resident of the Houston area since 2011, Vanessa began working in community journalism in her home state of New Jersey in 1996. She joined Community Impact Newspaper in 2016 as a reporter for the Spring/Klein edition and became editor of the paper in March 2017.


MOST RECENT

Photo courtesy Russo's.
Russo's New York Pizzeria celebrates 10 years in The Woodlands

Russo's New York Pizzeria is celebrating its 10th anniversary this year.

Two Lakes Edge's residential and retail spaces are expected to open at Hughes Landing in The Woodlands this spring. (Courtesy The Howard Hughes Corp.)
Fitness studios StretchLab, Row House will launch at Two Lakes Edge in Hughes Landing this spring

The Howard Hughes Corp. announced the businesses would occupy ground-floor retail space at the new 386-unit complex.

Conroe ISD board President Datren Williams listens to a public comment. (Andy Li/Community Impact Newspaper)
Conroe ISD approves Stockton rezoning, full-day pre-K, calendar for 2020-21 school year

Assistant Superintendent Of Elementary Education Debbie Phillips said the district received five applications and ultimately decided it could open for full-day pre-K in the 2020-21 school year without private partners.

J.J. Hollie, The Woodlands Area Chamber of Commerce president (center) is flanked by Montgomery County officials, representatives and community members at the dedication of a portion of I-45 on Jan. 17. (Vanessa Holt/Community Impact Newspaper)
Legislators, community members gather to dedicate portion of I-45 to The Woodlands founder George P. Mitchell

A portion of I-45 in Montgomery County is now designated the George P. Mitchell Memorial Highway in honor of the local entrepreneur who founded The Woodlands in 1974.

(Andrew Christman/Community Impact Newspaper)
Dave & Buster's opens for entertainment in Metropark Square

Dave & Buster's, a Metropark Square anchor, has officially opened its doors.

Howard Hughes Corp. acquired the two towers owned by Occidental Petroleum Corp. in 2019. (Andrew Christman/Community Impact Newspaper)
Occidental CEO tells Woodlands EDP at luncheon it will keep local presence

Occidental Petroleum Corp. CEO Vicki Hollub told the Woodlands Area Economic Development Partnership at a Jan. 10 luncheon the company intends to keep a presence in The Woodlands

U.S. Rep. Kevin Brady, R-The Woodlands, speaks to students at Covenant Christian School. (Andy Li/Community Impact Newspaper)
U.S. Rep. Kevin Brady and others celebrate Covenant Christian School's FEMA grant

The event saw representatives from the city of Conroe, Montgomery County, the Texas Legislature and more.

Feral hogs, seen here in neighboring Harris County, have been reported as a nuisance in parts of Montgomery County along Spring Creek, including The Woodlands. (Kelly Schafler/Community Impact Newspaper)
Commissioner: Feral hog trapping program to begin in Montgomery County Precinct 3 immediately

Montgomery County Precinct 3 Commissioner James Noack announced Jan. 17 he has contracted with a professional wildlife removal company to trap feral hogs in several areas on Spring Creek.

Raveneaux Country Club was one of hundreds of properties that flooded during Hurricane Harvey in 2017. (Courtesy Harris County Flood Control District)
Cagle: Goal of Raveneaux acquisition is not to put an ‘ugly hole in the ground’

“The goal is to create something more along the lines of Kickerillo [Mischer Preserve] with beautiful park amenities—little fishing piers, boat launches and walking trails that go around it,” Cagle said.

wayne gardiner woodlands township board of directors meeting january 15 2020
Officials plan action to address feral hogs plaguing Woodlands neighborhoods

Several dozen residents attended The Woodlands Township board of directors meeting Jan. 15 to voice continuing concerns about feral hogs in the Grogan’s Point neighborhood.

Both cities' candidate filing periods close Feb. 14. (Courtesy Adobe Stock)
Candidate filing period for May elections begins in Shenandoah, Oak Ridge North

Both cities will have open races for mayor and two city council seats.

The deadline to pay property taxes in Montgomery County is Jan. 31. (Andy Li/Community Impact Newspaper)
Montgomery County Tax Office to extend hours for property tax deadline

The deadline to pay property taxes in Montgomery County is Jan. 31.

Back to top