Removal of Hwy. 242 flyover tolls discussed; Woodforest Parkway bridge to be repaired: 5 highlights from the Montgomery County Commissioners Court Feb. 13 meeting

5

The possible removal of tolls from the Hwy. 242 flyovers and repairs to the Woodforest Parkway bridge were just a few items discussed by Montgomery County Commissioners Court Feb. 13.

All court members were in attendance. To view the entire Feb. 13 agenda, click here.

1. The court unanimously approved the granting of a discretionary exemption for repairs to the structural damage at the bridge at Woodforest Parkway.

The bridge has been damaged since the floods in May 2016 and was shut down completely by the Texas Department of Transportation in mid-January, after the bridge was identified as being “structurally unsound.”

Woodforest resident Christine Russell said the shut down of the bridge has left her neighborhood with only one way in and out of the neighborhood, and that road has also flooded three times in the past two years.

“This is really frustrating because this bridge has been damaged since May of 2016,” Russell said. “We’re coming into the rainy season again and [we only have] one way in and one way out and that [road has] flooded so dramatically that during Harvey, the road actually washed away. I’m really disappointed that nothing was done prior to this. It’s just a big impact to the people who live there in Woodforest.”

Precinct 2 Commissioner Charlie Riley said the county has been working to come to an agreement with Federal Emergency Management Agency to help fund the project since May 2016. However, those efforts have been futile because in order to receive aid from FEMA, the bridge would have to be built exactly as it was prior to the damage, which Riley said was a flawed design.

The granted discretionary exemption allows the county to award a contract without having to go out for bid to expedite the construction process. The project is estimated to cost $411,781.50.

“We can award the contracts today and are ready to start work,” Riley said. “We didn’t want to wait three or four months putting [the project] out for bid and going through that process. We knew we had to do it this way and that’s where we’re at now, so we’ll start work on this bridge immediately.”

2. The court discussed the possible removal of tolls from the Hwy. 242 flyovers.

Precinct 4 Commissioner Jim Clark brought the item to the court’s attention, advocating for the removal of the tolls on the two flyovers between I-45 and Hwy. 242. Clark suggested that doing so would release the county from an obligation to fund 100 percent of a third flyover, included in a previous agreement with TxDOT.

“The flyover is paid for and I travel that road almost daily, and as I look down and see Hwy. 242 full of cars and just a handful of cars coming across the flyovers, I don’t feel like they’re getting utilized,” Clark said. “We do need a third flyover but if we go ahead and remove the tolls now, it will release us from that obligation [to fund 100 percent of it] and we could move forward with the current program where we would pay 20 percent and TxDOT would pay 80 percent.”

However, other commissioners disagreed with Clark on whether the removal of tolls would relinquish the county from the obligation, which had been previously agreed upon.

Precinct 3 Commissioner James Noack asserted that he was the only court member who voted against the tolling of Hwy. 242 in 2015, and that Clark voted for the item.

“I would like to see these removed and I’m glad that [Clark has] come onboard in doing so, but I’m not sure it really has any meaningful impact on TxDOT moving forward with this project or not,” Noack said. “I think those are two separate items and I would be fully supportive of anything that we did as a court to remove that toll.”

No action was taken on the item; however, Clark said he would meet with TxDOT and bring back more information to the court at a future meeting.

3. The court unanimously approved an order changing the Election Day polling location in voting precinct 35 for the March 6 primary election.

Voting Precinct 35’s polling location has previously been held at the Robinson Road Community Center and at Oak Ridge High School; however, due to effects from Hurricane Harvey, the precinct’s new polling location will be the Oak Ridge North Municipal Building Council Chambers, located at 27424 Robinson Road, Oak Ridge North.

“I just want to thank you for working so hard to get this location moved,” Noack said. “We’re still dealing with post-Harvey issues and that facility is not available and I also want to thank the City of Oak Ridge North for letting us use their municipal building.”

For a complete list of early voting and Election Day polling locations, click here.

4. In a 4-1 vote, the court approved the funding for a new vehicle for Constable Precinct 2 Police Department for $26,025.50.

Noack voted against the item.

5. In a 4-1 vote, the court approved an additional funding of $7,149.17 of salary plus benefits for the remainder of FY 2018 for Montgomery County’s Information Technology Department for the position of Lead Business System Coordinator III, effective Feb. 24.

Noack voted against the item.

Share this story
5 comments
COMMENT
  1. Not putting the bridge in item #1 to bids to is EXACTLY what Commissioner Riley wanted to hear, so he could award to his cronies without a competitive bid process.

  2. Greg Schroeder

    If the bridge had a flawed design, why not have the architect/engineer pay for the cost to rebuild the bridge.

  3. I see no reason to build a fly over, such as 242 one, and charge toll. I never use it because I think it is ridiculous to pay toll when entering and exiting roads which are non toll. Eventually they will have to widen I45 access road because everyone is skipping the flyover. I think toll money is a slush fund for a lot of expenses if put to the voters would never get approved. I would like to see a list of expenses the toll money gets used for. I bet it is not for just repairs of the existing roll roads and loan payment.

  4. Bridge should never been tolled in the first place. Follow the money, it usually goes to CC special interest. You fix this problem by not re-electing anyone. Look at the SJRA fee on your water bill every month, CC are not addressing
    this issue.

  5. I have been opposed to the tolling of the 242 fly over since it was announced. It was and is a stupid idea. The traffic congestion that the flyover was supposed to ease is still there. Many of the left turners are students and adding a $.50 for every exit is something they cannot afford. Doyle should have known that but apparently didn’t, or had an ulterior motive. Remove the toll readers at once.

Leave A Reply

Hannah Zedaker
Born and raised in Cypress, Texas, Hannah Zedaker graduated from Sam Houston State University in 2016 with a bachelor's degree in mass communication and a minor in political science. She began as an intern with Community Impact Newspaper in 2015 and was hired upon graduation as a full-time reporter for The Woodlands edition in May 2016. She covers business, transportation, health care and other local news, specializing in Shenandoah City Council and Montgomery County nonprofit organizations.
Back to top